User talk:Blokkhedd

Welcome Blokkhedd! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 40,950,334 registered editors!

Hello Blokkhedd. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page and someone will try to help. To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own personal sandbox] for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your userpage.

Please remember to: The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes  at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
 * Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

 Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 21:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)   [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

February 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Sustainable Fashion, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. ''Hi, I went ahead and removed the paragraph Thus, concerns can be raised that the connotation between the terms "fast fashion" and "fast food" brings along classist issues and moralizations. Where poor populations are necessitated by social conditions to consume fast food, they also frequent the fast fashion stores for social acceptance and social mobility. Vilifying fast fashion is thus a position that can be taken by those who have the alternative, while it is not an available position to take from those in need. as it was not a quote from an outside source, but apparently a statement of opinion or a conclusion you independently reached, without support from reliable sources.'' BrxBrx(talk)(please reply with BrxBrx ) 18:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Circular fashion for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Circular fashion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Circular fashion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Endrabcwizart (talk) 18:29, 28 February 2023 (UTC)