User talk:BloodmoonNovel

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! A More Perfect Onion (talk) 17:14, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of The Darkest Knight
A tag has been placed on The Darkest Knight, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 17:14, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Darkest Knight Info
A tag has been placed on The Darkest Knight Info, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 17:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a web host
Please do not use Wikipedia as a web host for information about your novel. First, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a web host. Second, you have a conflict of interest regarding articles about your novel. Extra care must be taken to write articles in an encyclopedic manner and with an neutral point of view. Thank you. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 17:18, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not for original work
Hi. On your user page you write: "The Dark Times Trilogy is a High Fantasy saga I am writing as a hobby and the entirety of the first book - The Darkest Knight - will be uploaded here for people to read, comment on and discuss." I am afraid you have got the wrong idea about Wikipedia: it is a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedia, according to principles described in the links from the Welcome paragraph. One of its fundamental policies is that it does not publish Original Research - new extracts from your unpublished book could never be acceptable. Even an article about the book would not be acceptable until it was notable as described in Notability (books) - that is to say, after it had been published and made enough impact to enable independent reviews to be cited. There are many web-sites that would be happy to let you publish extracts from your book as a work-in-progress, but I am afraid Wikipedia is not one of them. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dark Times Ancient History
A tag has been placed on Dark Times Ancient History requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pontificalibus (talk) 17:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dark Times Ancient History
I have nominated Dark Times Ancient History, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Dark Times Ancient History. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. God Emperor (talk) 17:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dark Times Ancient History
A tag has been placed on Dark Times Ancient History, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pontificalibus (talk) 17:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

REPLY FROM BLOODOONNOVEL: I have to say I'm having a few problems with this. I'm not advertising, I am trying to produce an encyclopedic database of information realting TO my novel, not promoting it. It may be possible that I could be posting this in a more appropriate sub-set of Wikipedia rather than the main database. For example I produced ree'tak on SWTOR Wiki and this was not deleted. I was originally looking for a 'fantasy writers' version of SWTOR RP Wiki here on the main Wikipedia database but had no luck. If you know of a more appropriate place for me to be displaying this information I would appreciate some feedback. Thank-you.
 * Wikipedia is not the place to share the book you are writing. Have you tried NaNoWriMo or LiveJournal? --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 18:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * "Wiki" isn't a single organisation, it's just a type of website - there are lots of them about, each with its own rules and customs. At Wikipedia there is only the encyclopedia (and the behind-the-scenes machinery, notice-boards and talk pages etc, needed to run it); it doesn't have any sub-sets in the sense you're looking for. A Google search for fantasy writers forum turns up what may be useful places for you to start looking. You could have a look at deviantart.com - I don't know much about it but there seem to be fiction extracts posted there. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC)