User talk:Bloodpack/Talk 5

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Giz.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Giz.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Russian-assassin.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Russian-assassin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

help
Hi!

Radio broadcasting was mu life until I retired. From 1973-85 I owned 4 radio stations in Indiana.

I have written the following articvles for Wikipedia, and they are as factual as I can make them.

WRIN Wrote full article I owned this radio station fron 73-85. I have intimate knowledge of its operation.

WCRW Wrote full article WEDC Wrote full article I RAN these stations from 71-73.I have intimate knowledge of its operation.

WCFS Wrote early history section WKSC Wrote early history section I have historical knowledge about these places. Many "younger people" wouldn't have a clue about this history

WGLM Wrote opening paragraphs A partner and I were the people who FOUND this frequency, and another owner eventually began the station.

WIND Wrote early history section I worked there from 69071, and have lots of info about the operation in those years, as well as historic information about this operation.

Radio "history" is largely not written. Most of my information on WIND WCFS and WKSC are "my witness."

The WRIN, WCRW and WEDC information is FIRST HAND, I LIVED it.

It is all TRUE. No copyright violations to my knowledge. Some of this info has been there for a year, w/o a dispute. How can I see that this stuff is WIKIFIED and meets proper standards?

My concern is for accuracy, correctness, and posterity.

Thanks Rev. Tom Jurek tfj@tds.net Grand Rapids, MI USA —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjthedj (talk • contribs) 16:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Roadmap.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Roadmap.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello Garci timeline
After removing unsourced info from that article, there's practically nothing left. :/ TheCoffee (talk) 19:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Comic Book Idol
Sorry it took so long but I've made a start (and an easy to remember redirect: Comic Book Idol) - I'm sure there is room to flesh it out but those are the creators I found in the Comic Book DB which helped with WP:V. (Emperor (talk) 22:43, 15 April 2008 (UTC))

Image copyright problem with Image:Firstappearance.gif
Hi Bloodpack!

We thank you for uploading Image:Firstappearance.gif, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 21:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Spawn: Godslayer
I found your cleanup request for Godslayer and did some work on the article. Let me know what you think. - Harshael (talk) 06:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Tigersharks.ogg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tigersharks.ogg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)  -- Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Merge request
No objections for almost a year. Be bold. - jc37 04:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Daniel Llanso be merged into Curse of the Spawn - (Discuss) -- †B lo o d p ac k†  14:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bloodpool comics.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodpool comics.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

user info box
Hi! I like the way you made your user info box. May I ask you to help me create one for myself? Green background on the sections? Or maybe you teach me how to do it. I'll appreciate it. Thanks! And your signature is cool I'd wish you could help me with that too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monzonda (talk • contribs) 05:05, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for replying! Monzondatalk 05:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I did it! I added a user info box! Thanks for the help! Monzondatalk 06:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up about the email! Monzonda c",) 23:27, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

TigerSharks
I re-added the logo because I don't see a reason not to include it, even though it's also shown in the intro clip. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 23:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Pat Lee
Through yur reversion at Pat Lee you have removed a lot of material which I have added which is well sourced and added a lot of material which is poorly sourced. This contravenes our WP:BLP policy which states that: ''Biographies of living persons (BLPs) must be written conservatively, with regard for the subject's privacy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid; it is not our job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives. An important rule of thumb when writing biographical material about living persons is "do no harm".''

and

''Wikipedia also contains biographies of people who, while notable enough for an entry, are not generally well known. In such cases, editors should exercise restraint and include only material relevant to their notability, while omitting information that is irrelevant to the subject's notability. Material from third-party primary sources should not be used unless it has first been published by a reliable secondary source. Material published by the subject must be used with caution. (See Using the subject as a source.)''

''Material that may adversely affect a person's reputation should be treated with special care. In the laws of many countries, simply repeating the defamatory claims of another is illegal, and there are special protections for people who are not public figures. Any such potentially damaging information about a private person, if corroborated by multiple, highly reliable sources, may be cited if the Wikipedia article states that the sources make certain "allegations", without the Wikipedia article taking a position on their truth.''

and

''Editors should remove any contentious material about living persons that is unsourced, relies upon sources that do not meet standards specified in Wikipedia:Verifiability, or is a conjectural interpretation of a source (see Wikipedia:No original research). The three-revert rule does not apply to such removals, though editors are advised to seek help from an administrator or at the BLP noticeboard if they find themselves violating 3RR, rather than dealing with the situation alone. Content may be re-inserted only if it conforms to this policy.''

Since I am close to 3RR I have asked at the admin's noticeboard for input, but in light of this message I hope you will reconsider your actions. Hiding T 22:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)