User talk:Blooey

December 2023
Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to We Are Young—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jalen Folf  (talk)  22:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


 * That was actually an accident, I apologize. I wanted to change the figure to 10 million since that 6M figure was accurate for the first few weeks of release that year. Now, it must have sold more than 10,000,000 copies to be certified diamond. I wanted to change the figure and remove the reference but it was some sort of a coding misfire and that entire row was removed. Once again I apologize. Blooey (talk) 13:56, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at We Are Young, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jalen Folf  (talk)  15:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

"universal acclaim"
Hello; I saw your edit here at Kill Bill (SZA song) and want to remind you that extraordinary claims like these require explicit citations to RS. It's one thing to say reviews were positive, and it's another to say consensus on the song's critical response was unanimously positive. PSA 🏕️🪐 (please make some noise...) 01:43, 5 July 2024 (UTC)


 * But many reviews displayed on the page spoke very highly of it, so I didn't think that edit was a bad idea. Which one of these is better:
 * "critical acclaim"
 * "widespread acclaim"
 * "highly positive reviews"
 * "rave reviews"
 * "critically lauded"
 * Kill Bill was one of the public's favorite songs and the critics loved it as well so I don't really believe that "universal acclaim" is a stretch. But do enlighten me on what I can replace that phrase with. Blooey (talk) 14:54, 5 July 2024 (UTC)