User talk:BlubberWeed

May 2012
Your recent editing history at Onix Audio shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. QU TalkQu 14:21, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Onix Audio, you may be blocked from editing. QU TalkQu 17:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Let's be absolutely clear here. Regardless of whether the article in one form is "overly promotional" or not, it is not acceptable to keep reverting different editors to a version of the article that is incomplete, in the wrong style, badly formatted and just not very good. If you believe the current version is overly promotional then that is a reason to edit its content, not to continually revert it to a rubbish version. I have removed what I believe is the promotional material that is not supported by the references. You've been warned about edit warring. If you continue to revert without discussion then this will be reported to WP:ANI/3RR. Thanks. QU TalkQu 07:03, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Onix ELECTRONICS


A tag has been placed on Onix ELECTRONICS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 13:09, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Sock
You created. Any further sockpuppetry is liable to get you blocked. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:46, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Onix hi-fi: complete history


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Onix hi-fi: complete history. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Onix Audio. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Onix Audio - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. bonadea contributions talk 19:10, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Please see Content forking. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 19:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)