User talk:Blubbychubby

File permission problem with File:Aranha.SantosFC.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Aranha.SantosFC.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January ( talk ) 17:09, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Rafael-Cabral-Santos.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rafael-Cabral-Santos.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Infobox dates
Hi, when updating infobox stats you should update the pcupdate or club-update parameter by adding five tildes, which generates the specific time the update was made. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 22:02, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to FC Bayern Munich, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. QED 237  (talk)  21:30, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Neymar. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. You have been told earlier to update the timestamps QED 237   (talk)  21:32, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Julian Green, you may be blocked from editing. QED 237  (talk)  21:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at FC Bayern Munich. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:45, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at David Luiz. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:26, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Manchester United F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Lukejordan02 (talk) 01:15, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rildo concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rildo, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Timestamps.
Hi you have been notified about infobox timestamp before and the timestamp in career stats section needs updating as well when you update stats. Thank you. QED237&#160;(talk) 21:01, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * A second reminder, and your third notification bout timestamps. Start updating them please. QED237&#160;(talk) 21:42, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Again here. Please start updating the timestamps. --Jaellee (talk) 16:42, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Neymar, you may be blocked from editing. TIMESTAMPS <i style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:blue">QED</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 20:49, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Neymar. <i style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:blue">QED</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 09:50, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 22:35, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Further to the above I am giving you one last chance. Please start adding timestamps or you may find that the next block is indefinite 5 albert square (talk) 22:38, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rildo


Hello Blubbychubby. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Rildo".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Geuvânio. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. TIMESTAMP AGAIN <i style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:blue">QED</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 14:12, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

You can count the above as a final warning. You have been warned many times about adding timestamps and you are still refusing to do this for whatever reason. As I have previously blocked you, your talk page automatically appears on my watchlist if anyone posts on it so I will see if this behaviour continues. If you are unsure about timestamps I would suggest that you ask for assistance before making another edit to the encyclopedia 5 albert square (talk) 23:53, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

May 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Robinho. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. You have been told about timestamps many times in the past <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 20:44, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)