User talk:Blubewwy/Archives/2024/February

"Previous wording flowed better"?
I'm referring to this edit on the Hazbin Hotel page. Since I want to avoid an edit war, I want to know your reasoning before changing anything back, because I believe your edit actually makes the flow of the sentence worse in every way. Unnamed anon (talk) 05:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I am of the opinion that the phrase "Adam hints that he wants revenge on Hell for what they did to the exterminator" is speculatory and thus doesn't flow well at all (not to mention Adam doesn't really mention the dead angel ever again, most of it is Carmilla, Vaggie, or Velvette).
 * Meanwhile, the phrase "who is revealed to be a former angel" is superfluous, and the "who is revealed to be" could be outright removed since the sentence would flow better that way; generally, I don't really like saying something is revealed to the audience, and in this case it isn't really revealed to the characters either since they all already know/figured it out.
 * Lastly, you removed the mention that the earlier extermination is first mentioned during Charlie's meeting with Adam during the song "Hell is Forever", instead claiming it is during the TV broadcast that interrupts Vaggie's ad, and I genuinely want to know why you would change the timing of a reveal to be the wrong time.


 * @Unnamed anon The fact that Adam doesn't mention the dead exterminator ever again is a good point, so upon reflection, you can remove that if you want. If I removed the mention of the ad being interrupted, that was genuinely an accident on my part, and I apologize for that. That can be readded as well. However, I do feel that the phrase "who is revealed to be a former angel" is important, because this was specifically the episode where this information was revealed. Without it, the phrase "Vaggie, a former angel" almost feels like this was information that had been previously known in the show. Blubewwy (talk) 12:48, 15 February 2024 (UTC)