User talk:Blue844098/Archive 2

Khan Shaykhun chemical attack‎
You are not participating in the discussion—you revert without an edit summary. How do you account for this? El_C 03:24, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The discussion is not over yet, I may not be participating in the discussion however I have been following it. You are correct though, I did not put an edit summary when I should have. I apologize for that. Jp16103 02:13, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of History Matters


The article History Matters has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 08:38, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of History Matters for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History Matters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/History Matters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 18:37, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Salvation Junta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Junta ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/National_Salvation_Junta check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/National_Salvation_Junta?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Invitation from Wikimedia Portugal
(English below)

Olá. A Wikimedia Portugal é uma associação portuguesa sem fins lucrativos, fundada em 2009, reconhecida pela Wikimedia Foundation como "chapter" de Portugal. A nossa missão é, em geral, contribuir para a disseminação generalizada do saber e da cultura, através do incentivo à recolha e criação de conteúdos isentos de restrições de utilização, modificação e distribuição, e da difusão dos mesmos; e em particular, promover e apoiar os projetos da Wikimedia Foundation, entre os quais a Wikipédia, com ênfase para os projetos nas línguas faladas em Portugal, o português e o mirandês.

Gostaríamos de contar com o apoio de (e reciprocamente apoiar) todos os voluntários naturais, residentes ou simplesmente interessados em Portugal. Embora fundada em 2009, a associação teve um largo período de inatividade, que estamos agora a ultrapassar. Vimos por isso convidá-lo, caso nisso tenha interesse, a inscrever-se como associado da associação, demonstrar apoio à existência de um "chapter" em Portugal, e a envolver-se em atividades futuras inscrevendo-se na lista de distribuição de email. Recentemente, a Comissão de Afiliações da Wikimedia suspendeu o apoio à Wikimedia Portugal, pendente, entre outras coisas, do apoio da comunidade de editores portugueses. 

Agradecemos desde já!

Hi! Wikimedia Portugal is the Portuguese chapter of Wikimedia, founded in 2009 and recognized by the Wikimedia Foundation. Our mission is to contribute to the general dissemination of knowledge and culture through the incentive to the collection and creation of content without restrictions on use, modification and distribution, and promote their difusion; we promote and support the Wikimedia Foundation projects, among which Wikipedia, with emphasis on projects in Portuguese and Mirandese.

We would like however to count on the support of (and in turn ourselves support) all volunteers that are citizens, resident, or simply interested in Portugal. Despite being founded in 2009, the chapter has gone through a long period of inactivity that we are trying to overcome. We have sent you this message to invite you, if you are interested, to enroll as associate to the chapter, demonstrate your support to the existence of a chapter in Portugal, and get involved in the discussion of future activities by registering in the mailing list. Recentely, the Wikimedia Affiliations Committee suspended support to Wikimedia Portugal pending, among other things, the support from the community of portuguese editors. GoEThe (talk) 14:20, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

New WikiProject Socialism membership system
Hello! I'm in the process of introducing a new membership system to WikiProject Socialism (designed as part of WikiProject X and adopted by a few other projects). The new system works by filling a form which creates a WikiProject Card. I'm manually creating WikiProject cards for current members. You can find and edit yours here. Any change to your WikiProject card will be automaticalle updated at WikiProject Socialism/Members. If you have any doubt, please, feel free to contact me by replying here using the template. Best, --MarioGom (talk) 00:49, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Mao Zedong revert
Hi. Please visit Talk: Mao Zedong to explain why you reverted https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mao_Zedong&diff=922413487&oldid=921799793 Tom Haws (talk) 20:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Nobre de Carvalho Apology Macau.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Nobre de Carvalho Apology Macau.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 12-3 incident, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Portuguese, Red China and Macanese ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/12-3_incident check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/12-3_incident?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nobre de Carvalho Apology Macau.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nobre de Carvalho Apology Macau.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Chinese land reform
Much thanks and admiration for your additions to Chinese Land Reform! It is becoming actually useful. But one suggestion is to be careful about the format of the notes. For instance, I changed the reference to the Chen/ Davis FAO article using the very handy form " ", which links to the reference, which can be anyplace on the page. This is especially handy for multiple references. It also can leave the book or article in the References section, so readers can see in one place what the article has used.

I don't know if you were the one who put the reference to the Cambridge History of China, but the reference must be to the particular author and chapter title, not, as in this case, to Twitchett. This is the same principle as citing the author and title of a journal article, not the journal by itself.

We should also find a better reference than the Mirsky review, which is a tertiary source, and behind a paywall at that. I put the full info on the Dikotter book, which is a secondary source and much better. The link to the Google book is there. The Teiwes chapter would be good too.

Apologies if you know this already! ch (talk) 07:43, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Arnaldo Matos moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Arnaldo Matos, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:55, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

advice
nth Annual Meeting

These each really need at least one aand preferaably 2 oe 3 third-party sources to show their importance. I know the importance is sort of obvious, but it will help very much to hav some international new coverage added.  DGG ( talk ) 01:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited International Meeting of Communist and Workers' Parties, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Communist Party of Turkey ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/International_Meeting_of_Communist_and_Workers%27_Parties check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/International_Meeting_of_Communist_and_Workers%27_Parties?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from International Meeting of Communist and Workers' Parties into 17th International Meeting of Communist and Workers' Parties. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up. I will fix any previous instances of this. Jp16103 19:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about 9th International Meeting of Communist and Workers' Parties
Hello, Jp16103

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username StraussInTheHouse and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, 9th International Meeting of Communist and Workers' Parties, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/9th International Meeting of Communist and Workers' Parties.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

 SITH   (talk)   15:39, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notice for post 1932 American politics and related people
Doug Weller talk 14:50, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Report on an Investigation of the Peasant Movement in Hunan
Thanks for starting this article! I should have checked before I started my UserPage Draft on the same topic, but I have copied most of my work into the article, so no harm done..ch (talk) 00:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem! Thank you for improving the article! Your work does not go unnoticed! Jp16103 00:53, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Path Which Led Me To Leninism, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and Vietnamese ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Path_Which_Led_Me_To_Leninism check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Path_Which_Led_Me_To_Leninism?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

I don't think you are ever a Portuguese, because you if you were...
You would have known that how much hated Salazar was and under Salazar Portugal's Ultramar policies were detested in all of Europe, least of all in Britain. Britain "didn't want to know" about Goa... Britain did not even intervene when India imposed a total trade embargo on Goa, including a rice blockade since 1955, so why would Britain suddenly became interested and intervened in Macau?! 194.207.146.167 (talk) 10:47, 5 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I don't need to explain my familial history and the repression they faced under the Estado Novo regime. Feel free to have whatever opinion you want about me. Opinions are fine, but here on wikipedia we use references and citations, I suggest you find some to support your position on the role of Hong Kong in the 12-3 incident. Jp16103 14:38, 5 January 2020 (UTC)


 * No-one (virtually) who is actually Portuguese would ever (normally) refer to the Salazar period directly as "the Estado Novo", any more would a German (or an Austrian) person would (normally) refer to what happened in 1933/1938-1945 as "the Third Reich", especially when talking, speaking or writing in their native German (or you referring to your own Mum and Dad by their own first names... or am I presuming things too much here?!) 194.207.146.167 (talk) 17:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

You are not a Portuguese, evidently...
You sound more and more like a Chinese academic getting paid to pretend to be a Portuguese with a Macau background... the British Consulate, Macau wasn't a Hong Kong institution, and I do  NOT  even think there was even a British (note:  British, NOT Hong Kong ) Consulate in Macau after 1961. (There was a UK ( UK, not Hong Kong ) consul general  (i.e., (more likely) one "Englishman" with his mad dogs, together with his handful (under 10) of staff, a maid and a couple of servants), but there was apparently no UK consulate (a whole proper organisation accredited with the Portuguese Government in Lisbon, complete with its own formal building flying "the Union Jack") as such , in Macau.) Salazar was blaming Britain directly for not sticking up for Portugal, against India, over Goa, in 1961. For a supposed Portuguese, you seem frightfully ignorant of Anglo (UK)-Portuguese relations (or rather, the lack of it) in the 1960s and the 1970s! Are you honestly saying to me that Hong Kong as a British colony was somehow a self-governing "British Dominion" with its own independent foreign policies and foreign relations, of which the UK had control over?! You are mad, you really are, if you actually think that! --- 194.207.146.167 (talk) 17:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

I don’t know why you are so worked up over this, and did I ever claim to be someone with a Macanese background? Please see the sources, and notice, the info box is related to the civil conflict and those involved. It’s not a matter of support for the Portuguese by the UK. The reason why HK is in the info box is because institutions related to Hong Kong were specifically targeted by protestors. This is backed by a peer reviewed source in a Portuguese journal. Right now, your claims are based on your own supposed authority on the topic. That’s not the bar for references here on Wikipedia. Jp16103 17:38, 8 January 2020 (UTC) Jp16103 17:38, 8 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Respectfully, I don't think I am talking to someone with normal intellect, or even intelligence, if you can't tell the difference between the UK and Hong Kong, and Consulate (O Consulado) with Consul (O Cônsul) ! Or maybe I am the actual dim one here, who knows?! 194.207.146.167 (talk) 17:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Another personal attack.


 * The sources clearly state institutions owned/related to HK were targeted during the event. As a result of the incident HK accepted 2000 refugees. This is why HK is in the info box. Reliable sources support this. Jp16103 17:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 12-3 incident
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 12-3 incident you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Marqoz -- Marqoz (talk) 03:01, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Arnaldo Matos concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Arnaldo Matos, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Arnaldo Matos


Hello, Jp16103. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arnaldo Matos".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:10, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Talk:12-3 incident/GA1
Jp16103, it is important that you stop by as soon as possible and clarify whether you were withdrawing this GA nomination or not. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:18, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 12-3 incident
The article 12-3 incident you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:12-3 incident for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Marqoz -- Marqoz (talk) 05:01, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Regarding your message
I’d love to help you out with the maps! Unfortunately I’m currently in the hospital, but as soon as I’m discharged I will work on updating those maps for you. --MisterElection2001 (talk) 19:45, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you MisterElection2001, I hope you get well soon. I'm looking forward to working with you. Take care! Jp16103 20:36, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Alright, I've updated the maps for you! Let me know if the changes I made look good. --MisterElection2001 (talk) 22:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * THANK YOU!!!! The maps look fantastic! Awesome job. Thank you so much for your help!!! Jp16103 00:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Just edited the maps to show the tie in NE :) --MisterElection2001 (talk) 05:03, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Once again, THANK YOU!! It looks great. Awesome job! Jp16103 13:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Problem with your custom signature
Hello, I'm sending you this note because you need to update your signature. You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Your signature does not link to your account. This is usually because your account has been renamed.

To fix your signature, you need to find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences and either blank it or change the link to your current account name. More information is available at Signatures. New requirements for user signatures/Help. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures.

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 23:46, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Fixed your talk page archiving
Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 13:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)