User talk:BlueAg09/Archive 5

WTF
My son is in the hospital (nothing too serious). What's your excuse for being up? :-) — BQZip01 —  talk 06:24, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thanks so much for the Barnstar!! That was very nice of you and your timing was perfect. I was feeling a little down this morning and that cheered me up tremendously. Thanks for making my day. Best, Johntex\talk 15:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * P.S.: As I just told BQ, I hope you can forget about the Alamo as you look towards the new year. Best, Johntex\talk 15:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * BTW, I copied/pasted the 2008 UT/A&M preview from the 2008 UT page to the 2008 A&M page. I made the obvious tweaks to re-purpose it (E.g. removed the wikilink to A&M, put in a wikilink to Texas Longhorns, swapped the order of the won/loss records, etc).  Naturally you should feel free to edit as seems appropriate.  It could probably use more info on the 2007 game itself.  Also, when was the last time the Aggies won that game twice in a row?  We should probably add that to both articles (and to the 2007 articles for that matter).  I sure hope we can snap the string, but our running game seems to have taken a hit this week so that won't help. Johntex\talk 17:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Funny - I just got your message as I was leaving you the one above.  I'd forgotten about this bracadocio.  That is funny that you pulled that out of the archives. I will try to be more careful.  I don't want to lose this year's bet!!!
 * The Holiday Bowl was very cathartic for us, definitely. We really just pummeled the Sun Devils like we did NOT to do anyone else all season (except Rice).
 * I think the SWC Big12 South will be extremely tough in 2008. You mentioned Tech but let's not forget about these guys. Like Texas, they return most of their starters.  I think they will be the pre-season favorite for the conference, despite their spectacular implosion last night.
 * For UT, our 2008 schedule includes the top teams from the north also. We have to go into the frozen confines of Boulder and we have to play the 2007 north winner and we have to travel to see the Mangingo.  Add in an impressive Florida Atlantic team fresh off a the fastest bowl win for a new program in NCAA history (on our opening day no less) and we should have a tough season.
 * I don't know where we will start the pre-season but your guess of top 10 is probably a good one. Of course, we started there this year and that and $3.00 would have bought us a cup of coffeee.
 * I do know that if we can somehow run the table on that schedule we would end up here. We'll see what happens.  I can't wait.  How many more days to the first game of 2008? Johntex\talk 17:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 4 in a row from 91 to 94. Not that long ago.  McWilliams and Macovic coaching for Texas.  According to the UT football website, we played the 1994 game in early November.  I don't remember that at all.  I wonder why we played so early.  Do you recall?
 * Ah, Arky-State. We started with them in 2007, sleepwalked through the game, and needed an onsides kick to secure the win.  Embarrasing.  Let's hope you do better than we did.  In fact, (raises glass) here's hoping for greater success to both our teams for the new year.  I hope you go 12-1 with a single blemish there in late November.  I suspect you may feel similarly!
 * I think Jamaal really does hurt us a lot. He had a rocky start to the year due to fumbles but he really started to pour on the explosive plays in some of the later games.
 * After Charles, Colt McCoy was actually our leading rusher for 2007. We had a decent freshman this year in Vondrell McGee so we'll see how he comes along as a sophomore if he starts getting the majority of the touches.   We also have a mobile second-string QB in John Chiles.  I'm not sufficiently well versed on our recruits to know who is coming in the new crop or who we have redshirted.  I'll have to go do some research.  Johntex\talk 19:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Colorado wasn't the 2007 North winner. Perhaps you meant 2006? MECU ≈ talk 20:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Two different links. We have to go to the frozen confines of Boulder AND we have to play the 2007 North winner (Missouri). Both should be tough games for UT, I think. Johntex\talk 23:16, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject College football January 2008 Newsletter
The January 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

TTU football
Thanks for the offer of help. It's appreciated. I would love to see Tech as 2008 Big 12 Champions. I think there's a shot. However, Mizzou will probably win the North and they have the Red Raiders number, unfortunately. Best of luck to y'all with your new coach in the coming season. →Wordbuilder (talk) 19:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Campus of TAMU
First off, happy new year. next. I am trying to update the Campus of Texas A&M University page. I have a rough draft done, and I would like someone to look over it before I post it. Oldag07 (talk) 19:44, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Uh oh
Well, I've decided to apply to join the dark side. As a user with whom I have interacted, I would appreciate your input on my nomination. This is not a request for support, though any support would be appreciated, but simply a request for feedback. — BQZip01 — talk 03:34, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

re: vince young and the wonderlic
the article being quoted currently is slanted one way.

here is another account from usatoday that is supported with multiple sources countering the contention: http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/draft/2006-03-01-young-wonderlic_x.htm

here is one statement: "The NFL did its best to silence talk about Young's test. Combine officials said the score of 6 was inaccurate. Titans GM Floyd Reese said he'd heard the first test had been administered or graded incorrectly. Texans GM Charley Casserly also disputed Young's score Sunday, saying it was inaccurate."

but here is the countering statement: "ProFootballTalk.com broke the story of Young's score Sunday, and several NFL scouts confirmed it. Any score less than 15 is extremely low for a quarterback, and most teams want players at that position to score at least a 20."

so, on one hand, you have several NFL scouts saying one thing and verifying. on the other hand, you have the NFL and the titans saying another. now, it doesn't seem unclear what is going on here. the NFL and titans are attempting to portray young in the best light possible as a future NFL 'star'. it sounds like they quickly had him retest to avoid embarassment. the retest was taken the next day.

in any event, to display only the one angle on this is not serving the truth.

respectfully,

jay —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.183.61.196 (talk) 01:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the link about the game possibly moving to T-Day. I have added that information to the 2008 articles for both teams. Best, Johntex\talk 00:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks like the move is not a done deal though. - Johntex\talk 17:01, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Texas_AMU_logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Texas_AMU_logo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:42, 29 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Collectonian (talk) 04:42, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

2007 UT football page
Interesting, I had not known it had made the list. I do have plans to re-write in summary style, but I haven't found the time. I will try to get to it in Feb. I hope all is well with you... Johntex\talk 17:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thank you, BlueAg. I am honored and will display my barnstar with pride. →Wordbuilder (talk) 00:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Glossary of Texas Aggie terms
The Glossary of Texas Aggie terms is up for deletion. I have put a lot of time in the article, so i am very for keeping it. put please post your opinions on the issue. Articles for deletion/Glossary of Texas Aggie termsOldag07 (talk) 20:19, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

The WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue V (January 2008)
The January 2008 issue of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of WikiProject Universities! &mdash; Noetic  Sage  22:04, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject College football February 2008 Newsletter
The February 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:38, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Reggie McNeal (pt. 2)
I happened to have caught that same article earlier today and was thinking about the discussion we had about Reggie McNeal's status with the Argos last year.

That's is very interesting! His name is not listed anywhere on the Argos' roster page

Perhaps they have some sort of agreement in principle for McNeal to report to training camp ... maybe his status with the team is something that's gone unnoticed because of how far down the QB chart this guy is, I'm not sure!

As I said to you before, the Argos' transaction page is very lax ... and at times, so is their roster page (though not as bad as the transaction page IMO)! As such, I can never really gauge every single transaction that this team does based on the info they provide! I guess we'll have to stay tuned and see what transpires in June when the CFL training camps commence! If he is there as a fourth QB, I'll see if I can get an answer to McNeal's status between November til training camp by asking around with some of the Argo personnel there! Amchow78 (talk) 05:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

When I first heard about the re-acquisition of Reggie McNeal, you were the first guy I was thinking of! I was gonna make the edit & write a note to you first to break the news, but you already beat me to the punch! ;o) I guess that pretty much verifies my theory that I wrote above that that they likely had an agreement in principle, but would not announce/finalize the deal until a later date ... which would turn out to be today!  Amchow78 (talk) 22:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Featured List
I was wondering if what you think about bringing the Glossary of Texas Aggie Terms to Featured lists status Oldag07 (talk) 13:58, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * What the heck. . . Featured_list_candidates/Glossary_of_Texas_Aggie_terms Oldag07 (talk) 02:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Invite
Jccort (talk) 16:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC)


 * National Championships

Men's Golf - 1968 NCAA Championship Men's Golf - 1973 NCAA Championship Women's Swimming - 1979 AIAW Championship Gymnastics - 1982 AIAW Championship Women's Swimming - 1982 NCAA Championship Men's Swimming - 1983 NCAA Championship Men's Swimming - 1984 NCAA Championship Women's Golf - 1985 NCAA Championship Women's Golf - 1986 NCAA Championship Women's Tennis - 1988 National Team Indoor Women's Tennis - 1991 National Team Indoor Women's Track - 1992 NCAA Indoor Championship Women's Tennis - 1992 National Team Indoor Women's Tennis - 1992 NCAA Championship Men's Golf - 1993 NCAA Championship Women's Tennis - 1996 NCAA Championship Football - 1996 AP & Coaches Polls Championship Women's Tennis - 1996 National Team Indoor Women's Tennis - 1997 National Team Indoor Women's Tennis - 1998 NCAA Championship Women's Soccer - 1998 NCAA Championship Women's Tennis - 1999 National Team Indoor Men's Golf - 2001 NCAA Championship Women's Tennis - 2003 NCAA Championship Men's Basketball - 2006 NCAA Championship Football - 2006 BCS Championship Men's Basketball - 2007 NCAA Championship

Jccort (talk) 20:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject College football March 2008 Newsletter
The March 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note about the A&M game. I am glad to learn it is official.  It is very interesting to see that the Aggies have such a lead on Turkey-day itself.  Maybe the Longhorns eat too much cranberry sauce or something.  Please don't worry about the logo thing - you can't help that the question has come up in the past and it was a perfectly logical question for you to ask. Best, Johntex\talk 06:21, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue VI (February 2008)
The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of WikiProject Universities! &mdash; Delivered on 19:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

List of Aggie terms FA nomination
Bad news, the List of Texas Aggie terms failed FL nomination. Negatives, we did not make it, positives, this article greatly improved. I need a huge break from wikipedia, as shown on my profile, but maybe a GA push would be more appropriate. I think the article could pass now honestly, if someone wants to do that. I might push few months from now. Thank you much for the help! Oldag07 (talk) 01:57, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Eve Carson
You nominated the "articles for deletion" page itself for speedy deletion. Excellent move. :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 09:44, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I asked the admin for clarification, as I don't get what's going on with these various articles. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 10:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Vince Young
Vince Young did poop his pants. Watch the tape. It's his defining moment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkrhodes03 (talk • contribs) 01:55, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Timothy Shepherd
I wanted to let you know I modified your deletion rationale slightly in Timothy Shepherd's AFD. I added allegedly in a couple of places as this person has not been convicted of a crime. If this is a problem, feel free to revert. KnightLago (talk) 02:50, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, while he may be charged, but that is still different from being a convicted murderer, especially with the gruesomeness of this. KnightLago (talk) 02:57, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Ugh. I am sure it was a terribly sad thing for the Aggie community.  I live far away and tend not to pay attention to stuff like this and I still heard about it - hence my starting the article I guess.
 * I agree with you that moving the article is the right thing to do. Should we go ahead and do that?
 * Since the article will be more about whole case, a little more info on the victim would probably make sense. Obviously we would like to be sensitive to the victim's family; but if they had a Silver Taps ceremony there would probably be some solid references there that we could use to say a little about her life. Johntex\talk 02:45, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Big 12 Championship

 * I think the way it is currently handled (going to the football championship) is the best way, for several reasons:
 * To my knowledge, college football is the only Big12 sport that is decided by one championship game, as opposed to a tournament
 * Wikipedia generally prefers shorter titles as much as possible. We have Colt McCoy not Colt McCoy (athlete) or Colt McCoy (college football player) - we should move to the more complex title only if we are forced to do so.
 * Even if another sport has a championship game as part of the tournament, football is the most popular sport and most readers will be looking for football
 * For readers that may find the football game while looking for basketball, we have a link at the top of the page. Johntex\talk 07:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Another example is Texas A&M, which points to Texas A&M University. And University of Texas points to University of Texas at Austin.  Sure, some people will be looking for other campuses, but most will be looking for the flagship campus so our current link does the most good for the most people.  The others can use the  link to find what they were looking for. Johntex\talk 07:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree with all that. The "Big 12 Championship Game" title for the football game is fine. I actually meant to ask if we could disambiguate the Big 12 Championship article. Currently, it redirects to the football game. The Big 12 calls the whole basketball tournament under the same name. BlueAg09 (Talk) 23:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, interesting. That is the first time I have ever seen/noticed the basketball tournament called simply "Big 12 Championship".  I thought they referred to it differently.  I don't have strong feelings about this either way.  My thinking is that the the  link is sufficient so that is my slight preference, but I don't really oppose a disambiguation page.
 * One correction to my earlier post, the UT and A&M pages are not actually using the tag; UT uses  .  The affect is similar but not identical.
 * Again, I don't really have a strong opinion. You could post on some pages and drum up discussion, or as far as I am concerned you could go ahead and move it if don't mind moving it back if people complain or get confused. Johntex\talk 23:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It looks good to me, thanks! Johntex\talk 20:27, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

New policy proposal that may be of interest
I'm tapping this message out to you because you were involved at the AfDs of Eve Carson or Lauren Burk. Following both of these heated debates, a new proposal has been made for a guideline to aid these contentious debates, which can be found at WP:N/CA. There is a page for comments at Wikipedia talk:Notability (criminal acts)/Opinions should you wish to make a comment. Thanks for your time, and apologies if this was not of interest! Fritzpoll (talk) 15:26, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the clean up in M. A. Naser and specially for adding the receiving year of ekushey padak. Thank you.Tanvir che (talk) 16:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue VII (March 2008)
The March 2008 issue of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of WikiProject Universities! &mdash; Delivered on 17:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject College football April 2008 Newsletter
The April 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:15, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Kansas Jayhawks men's basketball
I really do disagree with your premise that listing every year would confuse wikipedia readers. Given that schools typically like to list (they are usually listed in the media guide) every year they reach a certain round in the NCAAs, I do believe that the only advantage your idea holds is that it saves space. Obviously, with a program like Kansas' there are many years to list and the infobox can get quite long. I have looked up several other school's men's basketball programs on wikipedia and have found in some cases that every year they reached a particular round, the year is listed, regardless of whether or not that was the highest round they reached. Only NCAA and Pre-tournament National Championship banners, Final Four banners, and Conference Championship banners are hung in Allen Fieldhouse. This is not true for a programs such asKansas State's. Bramlage Coliseum, has banners for all conference championships, NCAA appearances, and each year the Wildcats reached a round, regardless of whether or not they finished the season in that particular round. I have found this to be the case at many other Big 12 basketball venues that I have visited personally.

As a fan of Kansas basketball, obviously I have no problem viewing lists of our storied history, however I do not have any interest in an edit war either.

Many thanks for your considerations —Preceding unsigned comment added by Demoares (talk • contribs) 02:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

2008 NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament
Sorry, that text is not correct; it is exactly the text before it was modified to remove the incorrect statement. The Big 8 Conference changed its name to the Big 12 when teams from the Southwest Conference (SWC) joined it after the SWC folded in the 1990s. The Big 12 is the same conference as the Big 8 conference; only the name changed. Since Kansas won a national title representing the Big 8 in 1988, it is incorrect to say that the conference has never won before. Would you please revert your edit. I prefer not to get into an edit war. Thanks. Truthanado (talk) 03:36, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * It is true that Conference USA has never won before. It would be correct to explicitly say that. Truthanado (talk) 03:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You have a valid citation, so go ahead and leave it as it currently is. It would be original research on my part to change it. Truthanado (talk) 03:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

User:Fcktamu
I reported him to ARV due to the user name and edits. He has been blocked indefinitely as a vandalism-only account. Thought you'd want to know. :) Collectonian (talk) 16:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:12thManStatue.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:12thManStatue.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions.

April 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Toddst1 (talk) 19:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject College football May 2008 Newsletter
The May 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue VIII (April 2008)
The April 2008 issue of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of WikiProject Universities! &mdash; Delivered on 21:29, 2 May 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Texas page
I got addicted to wikipedia again. I think I have done what I set out to accomplish, improve the Texas page. I figured i'd ask around for some fresh eyes to go over it. I am going to take a break for a month or so, so take your time. After that I am thinking about getting it to GA or maybe even FA standards. CyaOldag07 (talk) 04:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Images
I think I got a bunch of image bot-messages that were meant for you, since I had added categories to those. The images are, ,. Thanks for taking care of these. Karanacs (talk) 17:12, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject College football June 2008 Newsletter
The June 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:14, 1 June 2008 (UTC)