User talk:BlueCanoe

Minor edits
I noticed that you mark all your edits as minor edits. However, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute, and I don't think this applies to adding images and paragraphs of text. You can switch off minor edits in My preferences under the Editing tab. Han-Kwang (t) 07:08, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I have changed my preferences accordingly. -- BlueCanoe (talk) 18:54, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Pleurotus citrinopileatus
Hello! Your submission of Pleurotus citrinopileatus at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Peter I. Vardy (talk) 16:14, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks; issues addressed at Template_talk:Did_you_know -- BlueCanoe (talk) 18:54, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Kitten- thanks!
 Sainsf has given you a kitten! She is happy for you contributed a nice picture for her article Amanita thiersii. Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{subst:Kittynap}}

Thanks again! --Sainsf&lt;^&gt; (talk) 05:50, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Pleurotus citrinopileatus
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   08:02, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks...
... for fixing up my errors in the Suillus salmonicolor article. I'm embarrassingly unknowledgeable about trees, a major weakness for a guy that likes mushrooms. Hope to remedy that somewhat this year, and maybe work on some tree articles later. Anyway, nice to see you working on fungus species, and drop a line if you'd like to collaborate on an article sometime. Sasata (talk) 17:40, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem -- I've been active on Pine-related articles in the past, so those red links jumped out at me. I've been enjoying working on fungi articles recently, and I run into your work all over the place, so thank you! -- BlueCanoe (talk) 18:45, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
— raeky  t  18:09, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Bruneau – Jarbidge Rivers Wilderness
Hi! We've been doing a copyright cleanup on a few articles, completely unrelated to your editing, but when looking at Bruneau – Jarbidge Rivers Wilderness I found a bit of text that had been copied over from the Public Lands Interpretive Association website. I've removed the text - looking at the site it seems likely that someone would have missed the almost impossible to read copyright tag on the page, (well hidden at the bottom), and would have assumed that it was PD from the US government. Anyway, I figured I should let you know. If I get the chance I'll try and rewrite the text a bit to get rid of any concerns. :) - Bilby (talk) 13:39, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, Flatscan pointed out to me that you had referenced a map, ratehr than the page, so it may be that this was a case of reverse copying from Wikipedia. My apologies if that was the case - I tend to be very cautious with copyright problems, as generally it is fairly easy to fix them, and fairly problematic to leave them alone. :) - Bilby (talk) 05:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for working on copyright cleanup, Bilby. I suspect that, as you suggested, this is probably a reverse-copy from Wikipedia.  I am aware of how important copyright is on Wikipedia, and as a rule I do not copy-and-paste text from external sources into Wikipedia articles, whether those sources are US Government public domain or not.  I have worked on rewriting a couple of articles on Wikipedia that contained copyrighted text, for example the  The Explorers Club and  Duck Valley Indian Reservation articles. I see that I did indeed add the paragraph in question to the Bruneau – Jarbidge Rivers Wilderness article on May 14, 2009.  This Jarbidge edit happened to be one day prior to my comment on the copyright violations of the  Duck Valley Indian Reservation article.  As you pointed out, the Public Lands Information Center website is copyrighted and is not the work of the US Government.  Unfortunately, the Internet Archive does not seem to have an archived version of the PLIC Bruneau-Jarbidge website, so I don't know how to prove that I wrote, rather than copied, the paragraph in question.  I recall writing that geographic description while looking at the cited Bureau of Land Management map; I unequivocally state that I did not copy-and-paste that paragraph.  -- BlueCanoe (talk) 19:16, 19 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, BlueCanoe. I looked at the map and the paragraph side by side, and I can see how you could have written it with a little extra information (I don't see a label for Indian Hot Springs). The PLIC pages for the Owyhee Canyonlands Wilderness Areas are of uneven length and quality, which makes me think that PLIC is more likely to have copied. Do you know a copyright cleanup regular who could take another look? Flatscan (talk) 05:13, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I don't see any reason not to just accept BlueCanoe's account. It seems odd for the PLIC to have copied a small part form the article, but I have no reason at all to doubt BlueCanoe. I might try a small rewrite so that there can be no issues, but I'm happy to put it back in. - Bilby (talk) 05:17, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I wasn't comfortable enough to restore it on my own, but I'll gladly go along. Flatscan (talk) 05:29, 22 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for understanding. I am fine with a re-write of the paragraph in question to avoid any confusion in the future, but I'll leave that up to someone else in order to provide a new "voice".  I don't know if you're using some sort of bot to check for copyright violations, but it may be worth checking other PLIC pages against Wikipedia to see if this is more than a single case of reverse-copying.  -- BlueCanoe (talk) 20:17, 22 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I with Backwardscopy. Flatscan (talk) 05:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of North Fork Brewery for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North Fork Brewery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/North Fork Brewery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ibadibam (talk) 00:15, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Penstemon davidsonii, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of North Fork Brewery


A tag has been placed on North Fork Brewery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 174.21.252.221 (talk) 03:14, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of North Fork Brewery


The article North Fork Brewery has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Clearly fails WP:GNG. Also a purely promotional article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 18:46, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Spore dispersal of Pleurotus citrinopileatus
Hi there! I'm working on this species for my PhD thesis and I was wondering where/if you had a citation for the line "Spores are spread by the beetle Callipogon relictus”? I was trying to find it in the original German article and couldn't. As far as I knew, there haven't been any studies describing this, but perhaps I missed it. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Gomgirl (talk) 20:47, 30 July 2023 (UTC)