User talk:BlueDevil1

Speedy deletion of American Journal Experts
A tag has been placed on American Journal Experts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 22:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Transcendence (talk) 23:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of American Journal Experts
An article that you have been involved in editing, American Journal Experts, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. Accounting4Taste: talk 23:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)


 * If you want to keep it, dont just say there are sources, add them . DGG (talk) 05:41, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * It is now done.BlueDevil1 (talk) 21:18, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Libel on American Journal Experts
I'm trying to figure out why you are posting the stuff you are posting about AJE and why you have been fighting as hard as you have been to get that stuff to stay online and not get deleted by the Wikipedia admins. It's libelous and you know it yet you continue to fight for it: AJE Corporate Info -Blue1 (talk) 04:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)


 * You don't understand the way it works at Wikipedia. If an article is written that is entirely flattering to a company, it will be immediately deleted because it is "advertising".  That is what happened to the first article about American Journal Experts.  They deleted the article in less than 10 minutes.  So in order to get past the objection of Accounting4Taste that it was advertising, I needed to write a "criticisms" section for the article so that it would be believed to not be advertising.  Every article about a company on Wikipedia has a section like that.  It was still not good enough for Accounting4Taste and he put it up for deletion again but this time it was put to a vote and not simply deleted by him.  A week later, they deleted the article again but not because it was advertising.  It was because not enough has been written about American Journal Experts to make it notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia.  What in the article is false? Bluedevil1.124.217.241.136 (talk) 20:21, 2 February 2008 (UTC)