User talk:BlueDevil54

Big Brother revert
Hey, what's the deal?

Was my edit not constructive? I don't understand why this was reverted. Clearly an issue of personal taste rather than a table technicality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by King1559 (talk • contribs) 02:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * It has more to do with the fact that there is a discussion for this on the BB16 talk page that no one seems to want to contribute to. I've listed my reasoning on there for why it should be formatted the way it has been done. It stretches beyond personal taste. You can read it there and debate your opinion if you'd like. BlueDevil54 (talk) 05:22, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Big Brother revert 2
Hey, just wondering about your reversion of my last two edits on Big Brother 16 (as seen here); the voting history table was made with consensus, and the one about the Head of Household/Battle of the Block twist was made to clarify the twist instead of rehashing the "HoH isn't necessarily safe!" tease that ultimately reveals nothing. Just wondering, since you made no edit summary. - Katanin (talk) 16:37, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Survivor: Pearl Islands. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:46, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Block Lift
Apologies to the admins if I'm using the wrong template. I believe my IP was blocked due to the actions of a user who created an account with a username that can't be used on Wikipedia. I'm under a shared network at an apartment complex so I imagine many editors have the same IP as me. Thanks for looking into this! BlueDevil54 (talk) 21:29, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Your addition to Big Brother Africa 6 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Brianhe (talk) 15:49, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Survivor: Cambodia Edits
Your edits have been removed. They are spoilers to the show that have only been released on a spoiling website. Not David Brown (talk) 21:56, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tennis at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Qualification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrey Kuznetsov. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Stop.
I already see that you get into a lot of edit wars with other users. You asked me to explain my edits and I explained them so why are you reverting them WITHOUT AN EXPLANATION. The hypocrisy. Please stop because if you get in an edit war with me, I will win. 76.168.49.73 (talk) 08:24, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't get into edit wars? I left a message on your page over a month ago asking you to refrain and you completely ignored me. I don't owe you anything. I'm not looking to start an edit war, I'm keeping the articles consistent and making them at least look nice. You use to continually edit pages to break the margins and make the articles look like crap. You can't even take the time to make an account here and actually contribute to the articles. All you do is change voting history charts to make them look worse.
 * None of the voting history pages have a font size set to 100%. This is to make it look nicer, since full sized text on the voting history chart looks like garbage. And putting the width at 100% allows for the chart to fill up the most space possible without breaking the margins. I really don't see why you care so much to about this and why you're trying to change something that has been the same for a long time. It makes no sense to me. Do you often go into other articles that are set up nicely and change them just because without considering the precedent or what might actually look good? BlueDevil54 (talk) 05:30, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:BlueDevil54/sandbox5


A tag has been placed on User:BlueDevil54/sandbox5 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    10:26, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – June 2019
Sent by DannyS712 (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 08:53, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – July 2019
Sent by User:ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:16, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – January 2020
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – July 2020
User:TheDoctorWho (talk) 08:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)