User talk:BlueMars

Hi, you recently uploaded Image:Venera13Surface.jpg and Image:Venera14Surface.jpg, and added them to the Venus article. I see that you placed a PD-Soviet tag on both images, which states that they are out of copyright because they were published in the Soviet Union before its 1973 change in copyright law. However both were taken in March 1982, and so are still copyrighted. --BillC 23:03, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Hello again. Don Mitchell has responded on the pages of both of the two above images. You might want to visit them and see if you want to reply. At the least, I think the PD-Soviet tags are no longer appropriate, as Mr Michell is claiming copyright on them. Regards, --BillC 01:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Please see Don Mitchell's reply on his talk page. He has granted permission for Wikipedia to use the Venera 13/14 images, for non-commercial use only. I have been looking through Image copyright tags for an appropriate image tag that meets this criterion and have been unable to find anything other than those under Image copyright tags. However, tagging an image with one of those non-free use licences adds the images to the list of speedy deletion candidates. Please see if you can find an appropriate licence from that page; if not, then the images will have to be removed. We certainly can't leave the PD-Soviet tags on them, as this tells anyone reading that page that they are free to upload the pictures and use them for any purpose, including commercial. Thank you --BillC 18:36, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Maps
Can you please stop changing the maps of every country? Wikipedia has been using the maps for years and we use the same format for every country. If you think yours is better, fine, suggest, but don't change en masse without discussion. I'm going to revert every one of your map changes. Aran|heru|nar 13:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, they may be good. They are probably more descriptive than the original one - but we used that for years and for every country in the world. Changing some into a different format is just, well, too hasty. I suggest you to discuss and strive for consensus - which you don't have now. I reverted most of your map changes, the rest to be reverted by three other Wikipedians. Aran|heru|nar 14:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, the thing is, we use the same map for every country to make it more convenient for users. Different maps - its like a making a pie with one-half of it sweet and one-half of it salty, even if you feel the sweet side is better. The EU is not that important either, because some countries are in plenty of "groups", like G4, G8 - and we can't give so many maps at the same time. It's better just to use a plain map. Aran|heru|nar 15:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

WP:GSWN
Hello, BlueMars! In case you have not heard of it before, I would like to introduce you to the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. Feel free to participate in the project! Olessi 17:05, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Hermannstadt
Hi. The piece of legislation, please. A language used by the town administration in colloquial contexts does not a bilingual town make. What you gave me was your personal guess. Please don't get me wrong: if it were an official language, I would welcome it. I stood among those who supported having variants in other languages for infoboxes of Transylvanian towns. But implying a degree of dissolution on this scale is absurd and, obviously, inaccurate. Not to mention that this form of "x/y" isn't used by wikipedia even in those towns, wherever they may be, that are bilingual. Dahn 19:33, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Sausenburg
Greetings, I am trying to get an article written about a castle ruin in the Schwarzwald. There is a German Wikipedia article on Sausenburg, but my translation skills are very sub-par. Would you be willing to help by taking a look at this article, and the sandbox version in my userspace? Thanks a lot.-- Eva  b  d  13:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)