User talk:BlueNose1111

Spam in A Pure Formality
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on A Pure Formality, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because A Pure Formality is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting A Pure Formality, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of On Line Memorials
A tag has been placed on On Line Memorials requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. gnfnrf (talk) 04:21, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Online memorials
A tag has been placed on Online memorials, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 21:29, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
You are obviously here only to advertise. Wikipedia is not a venue for advertising. Please try elsewhere. Guy (Help!) 21:32, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

You are entirely mistaken. I respectfully request you review my account.

History: I filed a reiew of a movie (A Pure Formality) which was thought to be spam. This is not true. Although it contained errors it was written because I sincerely believed it to be one of the best movies I have every seen. I was not given an opportunity to change my review or appeal. I was given an unlimited block.

I submitted two reviews of "On Line Memorials." The second review was submitted because I thought the first review was unintentionally deleted and I did not notice that my account was suspended. Both reviews were blocked. Permanently. Without the possibility of appealing.

If I had tried to spam Wikipedia don't you think I would have been more agressive? And persistent? I simply cannot understand JzG's arbitrary judgements.

My On Line Memorial article is an honest attempt to inform readers about the positive and negative aspects of subscribing to these projects. There is NOT ONE SHRED OF ADVERTISING OR SPAM in either submission. They contain no links or suggestions to commercial sites. Perhaps Mr. JzG is having a bad day.

I respectfully request another impartial observer review of these submissions. I cannot understand why JzG believes they are spam; they were not constructed as spam or with that intention.

Wikipedia is a valuable resource and I respect its work and aims. I do not understand how you can allow submissions and arbitrarily not allow reponses and corrections if your reviewer does not agree with them.

Allan Katz Napa, CA


 * Mr. JzG is having a fine day, thanks. The diagnosis of promotion was not mine but that of others who tagged the articles. Guy (Help!) 22:32, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Obviously you did not pay any attention to the specific requests in my note.

I asked you for an independent review my post for content. You did not do so, but instead relied on secondary opinions and cyber-blabber. Ah, but do you have the courage to read further:

The reason is that Wikipedia is an elitist society of insiders that do not tolerate people who may have honest interests; they are opposed to non-critical thinkers and have ingrained, harshly formed, immediate, non-thinking opinions. Is it too much to ask someone to "sign" their opinion? Is is beyond their value parameters to request clarifications? Do you think I would try to "spam" Wikipedia and then sign my name and tell you where I live? At least I have the courage to tell you who I am. You don't. Why hide behind anonymity? Are you afraid to tell me who you are and take responsibility for your stupidity, and the unknowns who reviewed my posts? I guess so.

I refuse to be associated with this kind of snobbery or gross stupidity. I tried to find a way to delete my account but I can't.