User talk:BluePankow

Testing my Signature
BluePankow 16:45, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

BluePankow 16:50, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

BluePankow 16:50, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

BluePankow  ✉  12:04, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

BluePankow  ✉  12:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

BluePankow  ✉

BluePankow  ✉  12:09, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenwood TS-820S has been accepted
 Kenwood TS-820S, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Legacypac (talk) 19:43, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Kenwood_TS-820S help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Ways to improve Am Aschenberg, Germany
Hi, I'm Pkbwcgs. BluePankow, thanks for creating Am Aschenberg, Germany!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add some categories to this page and link from other pages to this page in order to de-orphan this. However, this is a good start to what will be an interesting article about a German City.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:35, 28 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Will make some improvements on the article. Thanks for the tips! BluePankow   ✉  09:42, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Kenwood TS-820S copyedit

 * Thanks for the copy-edit! I appreciate it. BluePankow   ✉  14:46, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Lithops otzeniana) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Lithops otzeniana.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

The One and Only  Boothsift  23:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks very much! I've been trying to cover every nonexistent Lithops species article mentioned on the Lithops page. Wish me luck! BluePankow  ✉  23:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Lithops julii) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Lithops julii.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

&mdash; Stevey7788 (talk) 23:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Taxonomy categories
Thank you for the toast sandwich. You've been doing good work creating Lithops articles. However, you shouldn't be placing articles in both Category:Lithops and Category:Aizoaceae. As Lithops is already a subcategory of Aizoaceae, it's is redundant to include the Aizoaceae category. Taxa should only be placed in one taxonomy category, and that category should be for the lowest taxonomic rank for which a category exists (if you ever find yourself creating a large number of articles on species in a genus where no genus category currently exists, feel free to create the genus category). Plantdrew (talk) 18:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Gotcha, thanks for the tip! BluePankow  ✉  22:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello Randy's son!
Thanks for the message. Sorry it took me so long. I barely remember how to do this so I'm not even sure if this is the right way to leave a user message anymore.

I hope you have a great time on this site and make some friends. I found it very rewarding while I was involved.

P.S. I know your real name of course, but I don't want to "doxx" you.

Hope to see you all soon Decumanus (talk) 17:01, 28 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Good to hear from you! No worries on the time; I totally get it. Life tends to steal my Wikipedia time as well. Thanks for not doxxing me haha. I haven't made too many friends yet. None at all actually. The community is not as fun as it used to be I don't think, and people are pretty cold and business-like. I suppose that makes sense, but I still haven't found anybody that's not like either a stuck up admin or just a not very inviting person. Then again, I haven't really put in the effort to get myself out there besides on edits either. Hope to see you soon too! Have a good one. BluePankow   ✉  16:04, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Bartheletiomycetes moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bartheletiomycetes, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 94rain Talk 01:37, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Psilocybe kurac for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Psilocybe kurac is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Psilocybe kurac until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. William Avery (talk) 11:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Reliable references for common names
Hi! Just wanted to drop a quick note that because anyone with an account can add common names to species/taxa on iNaturalist, it's not considered a reliable source for inclusion on Wikipedia. I replaced the reference at Andreaea rothii for "dusty rock moss" with one from NatureServe for "dusky rock moss". —Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 18:52, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * HyperikThank you! I won't add that as a source again. I appreciate the information. BluePankow   ✉  16:13, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

WikiDodo

 * BestOnLifeform Gratias tibi ago. BluePankow   ✉  04:09, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Wikidodo

 * Thank you brother, we shall stay strong together! BluePankow   ✉  02:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)