User talk:Blue Square Thing/Archive 5

Happy holidays
Hope you've had a pleasant Christmas. Happy new year and remember: "Illegitimi non carborundum" Reyk  YO!  15:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Blocked
Hello there. User:BlackJack is blocked now, perhaps you want to come back? WP:CRIC is starting to become dead, maybe its time is over. Störm  (talk)  13:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * We'll see. I imagine there's already a sock in place... and in 6 months time the sock master will be back anyway. I have plenty to keep me busy. If there's anything important at CRIC then let me know. Blue Square Thing (talk) 13:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Maybe he'll be back, maybe not. One thing's for sure though: he can never again try to take the moral high ground with anyone. Trying to get people blocked for alleged incompetence or being not here to edit the encyclopedia, all while running a big socking ring, is about as hypocritical as you can get. If he comes back and tries the old tactic of yelling abuse at people and then running to WT:CRIC to sob about how hard done by he is, one only needs to remind everyone of the false flag operation he's been running. Reyk YO! 14:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I guess we'll see - I'm sure there'll be a perfectly normal way that everything is presented. Which might also be totally legitimate of course. I've enjoyed having a break - the problem is that the season starts tomorrow... Blue Square Thing (talk) 21:50, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

And it starts again
Kent County Cricket Club in 2018 Many thanks for setting up the page! I had been meaning to do so again, but work commitments have limited me to updates and fixes rather than any creation lately. I will absolutely be helping to keep it up to date and will put some arrivals/departures in as usual at some point. Could be a tough season though... Bs1jac (talk) 16:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)


 * I'm getting there with fixtures and the like. If you could check for errors at some point that'd be really handy! Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

WP:NOTBROKEN
It is not necessary to revert "unnecessary" pipes. "Wisden" was briefly made into a disambiguation page, for which all incoming links needed to be fixed, but after discussion was changed back to a redirect. These pipes, made as fixes during that period, can remain per WP:NOTBROKEN. bd2412 T 00:13, 10 February 2018 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks. If I'm dong other work on articles then I might remove some, but I won't do that alone. Blue Square Thing (talk) 07:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Cricket project
Hi, I would like to volunteer in contributing towards some cricket project. Can I request you to share some inputs with regards to this?

Vikram Maingi (talk) 05:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)


 * You need to go to WikiProject:Cricket then I imagine. You seem to be doing a good enough job at stuff like the PSL pages though. There's really not much in the way of organisation or guidelines there - just do your best would be my advice. Blue Square Thing (talk) 08:54, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

PSL
Hi! How are you? Please see your message here: User talk:M.Billoo2000. "I'd also like people […] out of the individual season." Should we start working on? Thanks! M. Billoo 02:50, 18 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Could do - I've not looked at a PSL article in ages to be honest, but it's probably a good idea to. Not sure if I'll have the time just now though. Blue Square Thing (talk) 15:59, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Virat Kohli
Hi again. I suspect this will not go down well in some quarters. I was reading about Kohli and found a load of stats for the sake of stats at the foot of the article. I deleted it all and it amounted to 50kb! Can you put the article on watch, please, in case I need your help? Alternatively, if I'm mistaken, then please do explain the policy to me. Not finding too much time for editing, I'm afraid. Busy, busy.

Can't help but laugh how the Aussies have given us the series but, flip side, it's ruined a great contest so more annoying than funny. Protea caffra (talk) 15:25, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Date formatting
Just for future reference, the fact that dates are written day-first in French does not automatically force day-first date formatting in English just because the subject happens to be from a French-speaking region. The rule for date formatting in Canadian articles, inclusive of Quebec, on the English Wikipedia is to not to flip dates back and forth based on personal or regional or WP:ENGVAR preferences — dates in Canadian-related articles are kept at whichever format, DMY or MDY, was used by the first person to add a full date to the article, and are flipped only if there's an internal inconsistency within the article. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 19:13, 5 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Ah, OK - found that now. That part had escaped me - I was assuming that as Quebec uses DMY that a strong tie to Quebec would count, but clearly not. Sorry about that. Blue Square Thing (talk) 19:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

2018 County Championship
Hi,

I have created a page on 2018 County Championship, which should contain all the details of this year's English County (Specsavers) championship. I saw that you were regular in updating the last year's page. I seek your help in continuous/ regular updates on this page with results, news, stats etc.

Thanks and Regards,

Vikram Maingi (talk) 03:57, 14 April 2018 (UTC)


 * I think I dealt with the div 2 template and then some prose, I won't be touching scores on there. Blue Square Thing (talk) 06:36, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

100 ball cricket
Hi,

I have created a page on 100 ball cricket. This should entail all the details around the 100 ball cricket, which ECB is planning to introduce in 2020. As you are a huge cricket fan, I request you to review this page and keep updating it as and when you find it necessary.

Thanks and Regards, Vikram Maingi (talk) 16:09, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Australian cricket team in South Africa in 1993–94 has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Australian cricket team in South Africa in 1993–94. Thanks!  Onel 5969  TT me 21:38, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

 Australian cricket team in South Africa in 1993–94, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 22:40, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Australian_cricket_team_in_South_Africa_in_1993%E2%80%9394 help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Stay stong!
I see we both got JACKed last night, I'm guessing he was on the beers yesterday. Unfortunately(?) I missed his full diatribe as it was deleted before I got to see it all. Spike &#39;em (talk) 08:40, 27 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Me too thankfully. I wondered where he'd gone. Reduces any thought of a standard offer though. Blue Square Thing (talk) 12:37, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Bishopsbourne Paddock
You should move this to Bourne Paddock. The contemporary sources used three different versions (the third is Bourn Paddock) but Ian Maun's researches prove conclusively that Bourne Paddock was the most common. Haygarth adopted Bishopsbourne Paddock throughout S&B so his usage has been transcripted here. To be fair to Haygarth, the earliest known primary source mention of the ground called it Bishopsbourne Paddock. One thing all sources agree upon is that the ground was a paddock! 213.1.11.20 (talk) 09:29, 30 April 2018 (UTC)


 * I was going to. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:30, 30 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Just one other point. Please do not cite CricketArchive for 18th century matches, venues or people. Beware especially of their "views" about first-class status. If you have a query about something in S&B, Buckley, Waghorn, ACS, Maun, etc. or just want a page number, raise it at the article talk page and I will see it, probably within a week or two, and I'll look up the information.
 * The majority of these articles have not been revised since the 2000s so I'm happy to see them being flagged up but information has to be correct for the benefit of the readers and CricketArchive's coverage of early cricket to about the time of WG is frankly unreliable, which is why the book sources are so important (and they are reliable). 213.1.11.20 (talk) 09:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Hugh Mackenzie (Royal Navy officer)
Re: I have no idea where Derry is, so I'll defer to you. Mackenzie consistently referred to it as "Londonderry", hence the usage in the article. Hawkeye7  (discuss)  21:59, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Derry, Londonderry. Same for most of us, but see Derry/Londonderry name dispute.  I was driving in Belfast a month or two back and every advert on the radio which mentioned locations said "Derry Londonderry", just in case.  The Rambling Man (talk) 22:25, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi. As TRM says, the name is one of those things about the North of Ireland which creates headaches for some people. I'm sure it will be referred to as Londonderry in almost all the books about his, but the compromise (which is fully documented somewhere or other, but briefly at Talk:Derry) suggests that we should use Derry where we're talking about the city really. It saves an awful lot of effort being expended if we do. Blue Square Thing (talk) 05:12, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Trident (UK nuclear programme) is currently undergoing an A-Class review at WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Trident (UK nuclear programme). Since you seem to know a bit about the UK, feel free to drop by and contribute a review.  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:51, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

2018 Royal London One-Day Cup
Hi,

I have created a page on 2018 Royal London One-Day Cup, which should contain all the details of this year's English County (50 over) championship. I saw that you were regular in updating the last year's page. I seek your help in continuous/ regular updates on this page with results, news, stats etc.

Thanks and Regards, Vikram Maingi (talk) 01:45, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Eric Norman Spencer Crankshaw
Hi, thank you for the edits you did yesterday on John Frederick Ireland. Since you know cricket, I have a question for you. Ireland's brother-in-law, ENS Crankshaw, was also a cricket player, but he has a military info box, so his cricket stats are not listed. Would it be appropriate to add a second info box for the cricket stats? What would you recommend? I appreciate the help. Diane Snider


 * Hi. I *think* that's the chap who only played one match wasn't it? I'll generally not bother with an info box if it's less than 10 matches - although some people will add them. I'd say there's probably no need here. Blue Square Thing (talk) 05:30, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

1990s tours to SA
There have been something like 800 Test tours since 1877. For some reason, tours to SA in the 1990s are subject to the most absurd nonsense. Give me one good reason why the results of Tests between A and SA in SA in 1993-94 have to be hidden - as you put it: "The stats are all properly summarised so the data can be hidden. That's one reason why this article was accepted as one that could be published - it has prose rather than relying on statistics."

The results of the Bodyline tour are not hidden. The Test results of the West Indies victorious tour of England in 1950 are not hidden. Endless pages on this site about Test tours rely on scores rather than narrative. What is the difference? Marplesmustgo (talk) 15:48, 8 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I made an editorial decision which, quite frankly, I stand by. Neither of the articles you cite as examples have significant prose about each match. The 1950 tour has no prose about each match and is, quite frankly, a very poor article in general with little that could not be garnered from looking at the original scorecards. The 1932/33 article has a short section of prose about each match, but is extremely limited in comparison to the actual Bodyline article.


 * In terms of "one good reason" then: 1. editorial choice; 2. the stats are all properly summarised in the prose (as you quoted above); 3. please don't try and drag the quality of the article down to the, frankly, appalling quality of the majority of cricket tour articles - the article also, for example, has actual references to things other than scorecards or tables of stats, which is pretty unusual, and it discusses the wider relevance of the tour - those are both unusual, so perhaps you'd like to remove those as well?; 4. there is no style guide on this so it'd down to editorial choice - so stick with the version which was published or get consensus for a style guide change (which I will, of course, adhere to). So will four good reasons do? Blue Square Thing (talk) 15:09, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

2018 Women's Cricket Super League
Hi,

I have just created a new page, 2018 Women's Cricket Super League. Can I request you to keep following the page and make necessary updates whenever required.

Thanks, Vikram Maingi (talk) 17:30, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

WP:ANI
Good afternoon. Nothing for you to worry about but I've raised this case about vandalism I spotted on recent changes earlier today which looks like ongoing harassment. Please let me know if I can help in any way. Thanks. Izzat Kutebar (talk) 13:02, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Imran Khan
Hello Blue Square Thing. Thanks for your recent contributions on cricket articles. I was wondering if you would be interested, some time in the future, on collaborating on an article on the Cricket career of Imran Khan. Ironically, the Imran Khan article currently only has one section dedicated to his entire 21-year cricket career. There is a lot missing, including his early years in English country cricket, which he has largely attributed to his success in later years. I understand the size limitations of the main article (which is already long, and mostly about his politics) prevent much from being written about his cricket. For instance, nothing was mentioned about his role in reverse swing which I finally had to add. Hence the reason why a spin-off article may be more feasible altogether (which is unusual but justifiable in such circumstances; a similar precedent might explain Boxing career of Manny Pacquiao?). Let me know what you think in advance. Cheers :)  Mar4d  ( talk ) 17:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)


 * I doubt I'll have the time to contribute, but I can certainly see that a spin off article might very well be a good idea once there's enough in the main article. I should think the politics will take over things fairly soon - or maybe in this case there's actually an argument which could be made for an article on The political career of Imran Khan?


 * I think there was an article I read earlier this year about him - either in the The Cricketer or The Nightwatchwan. If I have time I'll take a look and maybe add some stuff from there. Good luck. Blue Square Thing (talk) 18:29, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Anything would be a huge help. Even a sentence or paragraph. Thanks again for your positive approach, in spite of all your other commitments. I look forward to working on it as well, should such an article become a reality. Best regards!  Mar4d  ( talk ) 18:37, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Burnup
As the text of the article uses dates in the DMY format (and the template is shown at the top of the text), this format should be used for in the references as well. The use of dates in the YYYY-MM-DD format is not consistent with the text of the article. As I have not changed the content of any of your citations, the comment about the time spent "sourcing and adding refs to articles" is irrelevant. Daemonickangaroo2018 (talk) 12:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Did you read the bit that says that special rules apply to references? Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:04, 24 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Clearly not then. At least two direct breaches of guidelines. Excellent. Blue Square Thing (talk) 10:45, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

For info
Please see this. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 09:00, 21 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks. It was obvious from the first edit that popped up on my watchlist last month, but until yesterday there was nothing I would have been prepared to go to SPI about - and I'm away just now so that wasn't going to be easy to do. Thanks for tagging though - it had gotten to the stage where the edits were starting to get problematic again rather than constructive. Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:45, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you - I appreciate that, even if I don't think I do so often enough really! Blue Square Thing (talk) 21:43, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

FYI re coords
Per this edit it appears you have some awareness of coordinates precision. You may find WP:COORDPREC to be of use in the future (let me know if you have any questions, as I created that table). I have further reduced the precision of those coords per that guideline. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  11:27, 4 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks - that makes sense. I've just tended to cut to no more than 3 decimals as a starting point, but, yes, that's far to crude a way to go about things. Ta. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

PROD declined
Hello, Blue Square Thing,

I agree that Page (MCC cricketer) is a very delete-worthy article but I had to decline the PROD because it had already been nominated for deletion at AfD (Articles for deletion/Page (MCC cricketer)). You'll need to propose it for deletion again at AfD. Thanks for looking out for the quality of articles on Wikipedia. Liz Read! Talk! 23:50, 16 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I wasn't entirely sure if that was a reason for declining it or not - I suspected that it might have been but WP:PROD wasn't entirely clear. I'll send it to AfD at some point in the next week or so. Blue Square Thing (talk) 06:21, 17 December 2018 (UTC)