User talk:Blue fishy

September 2016
Hello, I'm Spartacus!. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sparta cus!  t@lk 05:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Babur (cruise missile), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Sparta cus!  t@lk 05:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. ''Don't remove source content. '' Sparta cus!  t@lk 09:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Sparta cus!  t@lk 09:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Note
Please use article talk pages to discuss and gain consensus for your changes. Your posts should focus on content only, not on other editors. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 11:59, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

hi the info on the babur thread is from a propaganda site/blog the site is well know to publish anti Pakistani material and should not be classed as a reliable srouce for pakistan/chinese material.

i added info on the air india thread too will 3 sources with pictures and he took them down because he claimed the sources were not reliable. since when did one of the world largest avation sites are not reliable? i feel he removed it because it portrayed the airline negatively.

but infact go look back at my sources and you will find them to be fine and heck there pictures too and that's proof in its self.

if you paint something positively then people will think that it good but people need to know the bad side to.

i thought this site is balanced but im starting to have doubts now

September 2016
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Babur (cruise missile). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. <sub style="color:green;>Muffled <sup style="color:red;">Pocketed  12:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

May 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ababeel (missile). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:41, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

March 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of active Pakistan Air Force aircraft, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. In what way is Deccan Chronicle'' known for "providing false news"? Because it's an Indian newspaper?'' - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 22:39, 19 March 2018 (UTC)