User talk:BlueandWhite2017

Your recent editing history at Awdal shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Please use the talk page to discuss your viewpoint, otherwise you will be reported Koodbuur (talk) 23:32, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Koodbuur (talk) 00:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

DRN case closed
Thank you for seeking assistance with the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. Unfortunately, the case you filed had to be closed as it did not meet the minimum DRN criteria. There was not an extensive enough talkpage discussion. Please use a talkpage to discuss ways to improve the article. If, after a good collaborative effort is made, a dispute still exists, you should feel welcome to refile. Nihlus 01:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring at Awdal
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 05:49, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. regentspark (comment) 16:32, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * When you find yourself being repeatedly reverted, please learn to use the talk page. --regentspark (comment) 16:33, 28 November 2017 (UTC)


 * When you are in a dispute about content, edit warring (please see WP:EW) is not the way to solve it and is expressly forbidden. And it doesn't make any difference whether or not you are right - after all, every party in a dispute thinks they're right! Administrators have no power to settle content disputes, and the admin action in this case was to stop the disruption cause by the edit war. Content disputes are settled by consensus (see WP:Consensus), and the onus is on the party wishing to make the change to seek that consensus. So when you make a change and it is reverted, the next thing you should do is start a discussion on the article's talk page, and not reinstate your change unless and until consensus for it has been established. I hope this makes sense and is of some help. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:19, 28 November 2017 (UTC)