User talk:Bluebird47

I insist on the "Fortunate" being left in the Hikikomori article. This is all I got to say. - Me

Hello. The reason your link to cogito ergo sum did not work was your capitalization of all three initial letters; it can be useful to bear that in mind. I've created the redirect page and bypassed it in this case. Michael Hardy 15:47, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:WaibaiduBridgeOld2.jpg
Please add the page where the image is said to be in Public Domain. Thanks. feydey 00:19, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Waibaidu Bridge
Hi Bluebird47. I made these edits from memory, so I can't point to a specific reference. However, as a native of Shanghai I am definitely sure that the name should be written like this - should say so in any reputable map of the area. The two characters "白" and "摆" are pronounced quite differently in Wu so there is no chance of confusion. As to the explanation of the name, this is the explanation I was told when I was little, and it seems to make sense given the name... but I could be wrong. Can I ask what was the source that gave the other explanation? --Sumple (Talk) 13:49, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Hello Sumple, it's cool to know your native Shanghainese, i'm glad to work with you on these articles. Regarding the name, I*m sure your characters are correct because the Chinese I asked is not from Shanghai and probably doesnt know for sure. As I have quite a few issues that need further research work / are a bit sketchy, I suggest to continue discussion at the respective pages (Garden Bridge and Huangpu Park; I'll list my sources and cite a few remaining issues. --Bluebird47

Spacing
I have to object against the large scale automated introduction of nbsp into articles, even though it is part of the Manual indeed. The spacing in SI is fine, but the HTML entity is not. I perfectly understand the technical reasons, however it moves Wikipedia further away from having both easily portable and editable text. It further raises the barrier for people who have no understanding of HTML and makes units in text very hard to read. As such, I see the disadvantages outweighing the advantages. In fact, I would rather suggest petitioning the right people to add this particularly function to the software, as it should be: same as we don't enclose every paragraph with the p tag and lists with dl and li, but rather the parser recognizes this based upon the normal text flow or easy to understand conventions, the same should be done with the SI units. However, until then, I strongly suggest only adding human readable spaces to units, as the HTML masking will not be needed anymore after adding the software function anyway. Bluebird47 22:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi Bluebird. I don't entirely agree with some of your comments; in particular I'm not sure that it'd be easy to unambiguously detect all the SI units and insert non-breaking spaces automatically in a way that wouldn't cause errors elsewhere. I'll hold off from making any more nbsp edits for the moment though, until I've had a chance to think about it some more. Cheers, CmdrObot 15:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

File source problem with File:HuangpuparkOld1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:HuangpuparkOld1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:09, 25 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:09, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Talk page problems
I was reviewing the Hikikomori talk page, wanting to archive it. You initiated a chain reaction of problems with this edit. Please keep new talk page subjects in chronological order. It is against Wikipedia policy to move your subjects to the top of the page in an effort to draw attention to them. It interferes with proper archival and is counterproductive because people looking for recent comments will go to the bottom of the page to check. Y12J (talk) 07:54, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shanghai Circus World Station


The article Shanghai Circus World Station has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not sourced since at least December 2009.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Technical 13 (talk) 23:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Meilong railway station for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meilong railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Meilong railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. CHENG SHIYI (talk) 04:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)