User talk:Blueclaw

Welcome!


Hello, Blueclaw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Scarpy (talk) 18:30, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Question about February 12th 2017 edit on Michael I. Jordan's page
Hi Blueclaw, I am a bit puzzled by your edit of February 12th 2017 on Michael I. Jordan's page and just wanted some clarifications from you. I am referring to this edit. In full disclosure: I am in conflict of interest with this article (as one of Mike's past PhD students), and so should not directly edit it. In your edit summary, you mention that the "notable student" paragraph sounded "like an advertisement". I acknowledge that perhaps the wording could have been made better to not sound like this, but on the other hand I think it is specifically notable about Mike that he has produced one of the most influential dynasty of students in (academic) machine learning. I also wonder what criteria you used to select the subset to include in the infobox? Moreover, why did you add somebody who was not even listed originally? Many thanks for you thoughts on this! Regards, Simon Lacoste-Julien (talk) 23:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gordon Kindlmann


A tag has been placed on Gordon Kindlmann requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. red dogsix (talk) 17:32, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gordon Kindlmann


The article Gordon Kindlmann has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Possible NN; however, the author has indicated there are many more references that will be added. I suggested they use WP:PROF as a guideline.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 17:54, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Blog link for David Eppstein
Could you please change the blog link that you added to the article David Eppstein from http://11011110.livejournal.com/ to https://11011110.github.io/blog/ ? I recently switched my blogging host to github after LiveJournal changed its terms of service to something I'm unwilling to agree to. (I can't even leave a posting on the livejournal address saying that the blog has moved to Github without agreeing to the terms of service, but I plan to delete the old location within the next few months). —David Eppstein (talk) 21:45, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Blueclaw, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Scientific glassblowing have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk  19:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: University of Utah College of Science has been accepted
 University of Utah College of Science, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  03:47, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Speedy deletion nomination of David M. Beazley


A tag has been placed on David M. Beazley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. red dogsix (talk) 19:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

People in Python
I noticed that you have added some people to Category:Python (programming language). I think you have identified enough people to justify moving them into a new category, something like Category:People in Python (programming language) (following the "People in..." pattern of, e.g., Category:People in computing and Category:People in educational technology) or Category:Python programmers (although since some of the people may be architects of the Python platform rather than merely "programmers", perhaps this category title is too narrow). The category could be placed both in Category:Python (programming language) and in Category:Computer programmers. What do you think? Biogeographist (talk) 18:58, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * This sounds great. I'm a fan of Category:People in Python (programming language) because it allows language designers and researchers to fit the category description, although it doesn't appear to fit the naming style found with similar languages. I think that Category:Python people might make the most sense, as it follows Category:Perl people. Thoughts? Blueclaw (talk) 02:47, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Category:Python people sounds fine to me. Go ahead and move the people there if you wish. The category can go in: Category:Python (programming language), Category:Free software people, Category:Free software programmers (instead of Category:Computer programmers; I saw the latter two categories when I looked at Category:Perl people). Biogeographist (talk) 03:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Category:IEEE Centennial Medal laureates
Where are you getting your information about who to put into Category:IEEE Centennial Medal laureates? Mulligatawny (talk) 23:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I haven't been able to find a central repository for the 1,984 people who received these medals so I've been adding people who have it mentioned in biographical articles. If you believe I've added anyone in error, I'll double check the source. --Blueclaw (talk) 00:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I had no idea so many people got those. But let's look at the last five in which that appears in your edit summaries – Robert G. Gallager, Robert M. Gray, Andries van Dam, Thelma Estrin, and Irene C. Peden. I don't see any mention of receiving the IEEE Centennial Medal in any of those articles. Mulligatawny (talk) 05:17, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Fixed - I sourced the claim for each person and added an explicit mention of the award to each page. Feel free to go back and double-check to ensure accuracy. --Blueclaw (talk) 14:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Scientists at PARC
Thanks for creating Category:Scientists at PARC. In case you're not already using it, you may want to check its new contents against List of people associated with PARC (and vice versa) to make sure neither one of these is missing people. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:53, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up about that list. I'll try to keep it even with the category. --Blueclaw (talk) 23:56, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, good stuff. You can add me if you like; and/or work on my neglected article: Richard Francis Lyon. Dicklyon (talk) 04:47, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Excellent; you've been added. I'll see what I can do about fixing the state of your article. --Blueclaw (talk) 05:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I bet we could make a good article on Gaetano Borriello, too. Dicklyon (talk) 03:09, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Good call. I created a stub and linked to it from various mentions. There's a lot of good material about his life and impact so it should make for a pretty good piece. --Blueclaw (talk) 19:28, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I did a bit on that, too. I'll see if I can come up with a photo.  And thanks for the article on Malcolm Slaney, too. Dicklyon (talk) 04:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I see you did one on Olivier Faugeras, too. I mention him in my paper linked from pixel: .  Do you know a lot of these people, or just good at digging stuff up?  Dicklyon (talk) 05:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
 * There's a bit of both. I know a lot of these people by association and it still surprises me when someone has the necessary and sufficient accolades to warrant a Wikipedia biography and yet the page doesn't exist. I find stories about the people behind amazing scientific and engineering accomplishments to be both fascinating and motivating, which makes it easy to dig up material for these types of articles. --Blueclaw (talk) 16:37, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Same here. When I was at PARC, I had the great fortune to get to know Ivan Sutherland and most of his ex students, as well as Tom Stockham and some of his. Through them and others I got a pretty good MIT connection, too.  Harvard, less so.  Anyway, we may be decades apart, but we overlap a lot in who we associate with. Dicklyon (talk) 03:20, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Jeanette Dwyer
There are 11 links on that article. I counted.Johnny Spasm (talk) 10:24, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * There are 11 links on the article that lead to other pages, but only one page in the encyclopedia links back to this article (which is the link I added on the National Rural Letter Carriers' Association page). There are likely other pages that can link to this article. --Blueclaw (talk) 14:32, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * As a follow-up, I found another article to link back to the Jeanette Dwyer article, so I've removed the orphan tag. I also added the page to some relevant categories to help integrate it into the encyclopedia. --Blueclaw (talk) 22:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Dan Blum
Hi Blueclaw, I have updated the information on the author page for Dan Blum. I know Dan personally, and based on my understanding of his contributions and Wikipedia definition of notability I believe he qualifies. To that end I have added additional third-party references and links. Norramic (talk) 13:39, 22 July 2017 (UTC)Norramic
 * Looking at the Wikipedia general notability guidelines, I'm not entirely convinced that this meets the criteria. Notability requires "significant coverage" that addresses the topic directly and in detail so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Third-party references are of course necessary, but I only see one that isn't an interview or a short book review. As it stands, he doesn't meet the notability guidelines. --Blueclaw (talk) 18:06, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Paula Bonta) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Paula Bonta, Blueclaw!

Wikipedia editor Anoptimistix just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thank you for your contributions !"

To reply, leave a comment on Anoptimistix's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Anoptimistix  Let's Talk  16:15, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi Blueclaw, I just wanted to let you know that I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&page=User%3ABlueclaw added] the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )  10:37, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Edie Rodriguez
seemed to be enough there to avoid an A7. Suggest AfD if you really think it needs to go. StarM 02:42, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Hugo Rossi
Hugo Rossi definitely came to University of Utah before 1985. I was there from 1975-78 and he was there. Perhaps you mean[t] 1975? Thanks for getting this right. Regards, Zigli Lucien (talk) 00:13, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for catching this. I've fixed the error. --Blueclaw (talk) 02:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of VISPACK
Hello, Blueclaw. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, VISPACK, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit edit the page]
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Rentier (talk) 16:54, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I am ok with the page being deleted. I created the page because I thought that it was a more widely-used package than it appears to be now. Given that there doesn't appear to be recent work on it or significant and sustained community usage, I agree that it doesn't fit the criteria for inclusion.--Blueclaw (talk) 17:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

James Kaiser
Hello,

I just came across this page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Kaiser, that you created. This is my grandfather! I am very pleased to see this nice summary of his contributions. I am visiting him next weekend and am excited to show him his page. Thank you for putting it together!

All the best, Heather

(Sorry if this is not the right place to put this, I'm not totally familiar with Wikipedia etiquette)
 * Oh wonderful! He's made some pretty significant contributions to engineering and you must be very proud :) I'm glad you're pleased with what I was able to put together about him and I hope he is as well. Best wishes to you both! --Blueclaw (talk) 00:07, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

A page you started (IEEE Visualization) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating IEEE Visualization, Blueclaw!

Wikipedia editor Usernamekiran just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks a lot for creating good articles, so many! Regarding this article, the only thing I could think of is, tables would be better for awards. Please feel free to contact me if you want to discuss it further. :)"

To reply, leave a comment on Usernamekiran's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

— usernamekiran (talk)  04:49, 21 December 2017 (UTC)


 * I am also interested in improving sort of forgotten articles about computer science. I think my first edit here was on CP/M of Gary Kildall. I am surprised how I never saw you before. I would love to co-work with you on some article. — <span style="font-family: monospace, monospace;">usernamekiran (talk)  04:54, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1892 in science, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/1892_in_science check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/1892_in_science?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Bob Johnson
Blueclaw, there's another good Utah CS guy who needs an article: Robert Royce Johnson. Our bud Brunvand commented in his obit. And thanks for the article on Jim Kaiser; just noticed the note from his granddaughter above. I got a note from a John Robinson Pierce grand-nephew recently, too. Dicklyon (talk) 05:32, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

I had an email interchange with Heather to follow up, and with her mom June, Jim's daughter. June said Jim enjoyed seeing the article. We should catch up some time. Dicklyon (talk) 06:16, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Jan Brandt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jan Brandt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jan Brandt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meeanaya (talk) 13:44, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Technical Committee on Visualization and Graphics for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Technical Committee on Visualization and Graphics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Technical Committee on Visualization and Graphics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:05, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Orders, decorations, and medals of Utah has been nominated for upmerging
Category:Orders, decorations, and medals of Utah has been nominated for upmerging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

FLRC for list of computer criminals
I have nominated List of computer criminals for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 18:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Suggestion to remove category you added
Hi Blueclaw, I'm quite new here, but I noticed you added "German computer criminals" category to Stephanie Wehner. From briefly reading about her and watching the introduction of her [|Ted lecture, I understand she was an ethical hacker, not a criminal, and that she's Dutch. Would you agree with me to undo this category addition? Thank you. [[User:Talchu|Talchu]] (talk) 21:51, 7 December 2023 (UTC)