User talk:Bluefish1111

October 2012
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Solar cycle 24. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   22:48, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Specifically, please do not insert movie promotion into articles.  Acroterion   (talk)   22:50, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to List of solar cycles. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Acroterion   (talk)   22:54, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Solar storm of 1859. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:54, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

You were warned by template and hand-written note four times: you stopped and waited, then came back and did the same thing you'd been warned for three more times, apparently hoping they would go unnoticed. You haven't made any edits on any other subject. Can you explain how you might edit in the future, bearing in mind that a condition of any unblock would require you to avoid the the movie and related subjects entirely, not just "post only once?" In the meantime, I suggest that you review some guidelines and policies: WP:SPAM, WP:ELNO, WP:NPOV (which requires that fringe topics be described accordingly if that is the consensus of mainstream and scholarly sources), WP:FRINGE, WP:BRD, WP:RS and WP:V.  Acroterion   (talk)   00:55, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:21, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

I am willing to consider unblocking you, to give you another chance. However, one thing gives me pause. Can you please explain this edit? Even if we assume good faith about the addition of content about the film, we still have two rather puzzling removals. Even to someone who knew nothing else about Jesse Ventura, it would clearly be evident that someone who "questioned whether the government is using the site to manipulate the weather or to bombard people with mind-controlling radio waves" might be considered a conspiracy theorist, and a little more knowledge of his career would confirm it, so why did you remove the mention of the fact? JamesBWatson (talk) 20:39, 12 October 2012 (UTC)