User talk:Blueflamedscorpio

Speedy deletion nomination of BiUnity
A tag has been placed on BiUnity, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of BiUnity and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -99.255.188.158 (talk) 02:42, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BiUnity
A tag has been placed on BiUnity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fribbulus Xax (talk) 13:08, 25 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I thought I would take a moment to explain what's going on here, as you may be finding this a little frustrating. No one doubts for a moment that your group exists or that it does what you say it does, etc.  What is being requested is proof of notability -- quotations from expert sources who are not affiliated with the group, writing in reliable sources, that say that the group is somehow special or unusual.  It is not enough for a group merely to exist to be the subject of a wikipedia article; it has to be notable, that notability has to be corroborated by experts and that corroboration has to be verifiable.  For in-depth discussion of any of the concepts I'm talking about, you can follow the links in this paragraph, and for background information that may inform you generally you can look at WP:Your first article and WP:Why was my article deleted?.  If you have any questions after reading through that material, feel free to leave me a note.  Accounting4Taste: talk 16:57, 25 August 2009 (UTC)