User talk:Bluehawk4

June 2018
Hello, I'm Tillerh11. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Stoneman Douglas High School shooting— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Tillerh11 (talk) 03:03, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:04, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Stoneman Douglas High School shooting was changed by Bluehawk4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.901868 on 2018-06-08T03:04:27+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lindsey Graham, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Lindsey Graham was changed by Bluehawk4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876149 on 2018-06-08T03:06:40+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:06, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lindsey Graham. Donner60 (talk) 03:09, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm new to Wikipedia and am not sure if I did something wrong with that edit. I just tried to clarify Graham's beginning presidential platform. Was it because I didn't include a source? It was a fairly minor edit that was already supported by sources that were already in the article, I wasn't sure it needed one.

Why do all my edits keep get deleted? Sigh, I don't understand what I'm supposed to do. Bluehawk4 (talk) 03:21, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 03:35, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Won't someone at least tell me why what I'm doing is vandalism? What have I posted that isn't a minor but well-sourced, cogent point?


 * This hardly counts as a "cogent point". —C.Fred (talk) 03:39, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

But it was true and it had the citation link right next to it. Do you have any proof that it's not true? If not, why not let it out there and wait until someone can disprove it? I believe people have the right to know the truth. Please unban, thank you. Bluehawk4 (talk) 03:48, 8 June 2018 (UTC)


 * It was clear vandalism and certainly not something that would be in a reliable source. —C.Fred (talk) 03:51, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

But it was true. Why do people think that the American people don't have the right to know the truth? Vandalism is about lying, my edits are about being true.