User talk:Bluejos8

Welcome!

Hello, Bluejos8, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Chris Howie, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 5 albert square (talk) 22:34, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Chris Howie


A tag has been placed on Chris Howie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. 5 albert square (talk) 22:34, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Notability of Robby Coathanger (Sir Mystic)
The article Robby Coathanger (Sir Mystic) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —C.Fred (talk) 22:49, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ahh oo., to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 23:13, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Transmission of Religion


The article Transmission of Religion has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Essay

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 23:17, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Can I ask why you objected to this? It says that you can remove the tag but it also says that you should state why you object to the article being proposed for deletion.  I cannot see anything stating why you object to it and the article still looks like an essay because it is far too long.--5 albert square (talk) 23:33, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Can I delete half of it, then we will be cool?


 * It would depend, it would need to be looked at again then.--5 albert square (talk) 23:40, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Which half should I delete?


 * I'm afraid I don't know as I have no knowledge of the subject. However it may not be a case of just deleting text, maybe you could still cover the subjects but in a little less detail?--5 albert square (talk) 23:46, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

When I write, it is my goal to share all of my knowledge of that subject to the world. Every detail matters. Every step in the process matters. Not one detail was over looked in this piece and every detail that is in this piece was placed there for a specific reason. I've worked for 3 years on preparing this article and if there is ANYTHING that I have learned in my 46 years of life, it is that EVERY detail counts.

An apology would be appreciated.


 * OK, it was only a suggestion, I'm sorry if I've offended you.--5 albert square (talk) 00:50, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

It is okay. May I ask if you enjoyed the piece or if you have any comments about the actual structural integrity of the piece?


 * Yes, I enjoyed the article. The only comment I would have is that it is long :)--5 albert square (talk) 01:25, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

I appreciate the input, but what I would really like to discuss and get your opinion on is the actual structural integrity of the piece as a whole. Any ideas or comments about the structural integrity specifically?

There's a crucial distinction here between an encyclopedia entry and an essay, and this appears to be the latter. Have a look at Not. Hairhorn (talk) 01:46, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry but this is most definitely a Wikipedia article and was never meant to be or be perceived as an essay. But I was asking you about the structural integrity of the piece more specifically. What are your opinions about that?


 * Sorry, but this is an essay. Throughout the piece, you are expressing your own personal opinion and ideas, such as:
 * "I see all religions as different ways of worshiping the same thing"


 * " I have come to this conclusion by looking at what type of culture the people who write the bible lived in"


 * "The most difficult situation I have encountered in trying to discuss some of these topics with very religious people, is that they tend to be very close minded"


 * and so on. See No original research for more explanation on the difference between essays and entries. Hairhorn (talk) 02:27, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

While I do state opinions in my article, they are not of my own, but of the people who have proper credentials and credibility in their field of which I had cited. Therefore they are completely objective and still fall with in "Wikipedia article" criteria.
 * I encourage you to look at the links I provided, where the point you make is discussed; the word "I" doesn't appear in entries outside of quotation marks. Hairhorn (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 06:53, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Transmission of Religion


The article Transmission of Religion has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a publisher of essays or research papers

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 20:32, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Phatdik


A tag has been placed on Phatdik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. GPL93 (talk) 14:32, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Lil Dicky—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 04:54, 4 May 2020 (UTC)