User talk:Bluekarr88844

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Joyous! | Talk 21:25, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: "beautiful"
Heya. I just deleted article "beautiful" again. I have to regrettably inform that the article in question was, ahem, not quite encyclopedia material. Basically, the article amounted to nothing more than blatantly wrong nonsense, which I removed on grounds of vandalism (a bit stretching, I guess). Basically, Wikipedia is not meant for telling people how beautiful girlfriend you have. If you prefer, use your user page for that, but in moderation. =) On the other hand, if it was true, it claimed it was mostly a copy of American Heritage Dictionary communique, posting of which would constitute a copyright violation from a commercial source, which is also speedy-deletable.

If the article is correct, please use your own words, provide sources, preferrably also online copies, and extremely preferrable also other sources. Surely such a change of a definition in a major dictionary would net media mentions! Also, the article title is problematic; Wikipedia is not a dictionary, we cover beauty as an encyclopedic topic but not dictionary definition of the word, which would be at Wiktionary. Besides, fascinating editorial fiats of AHD would probably be discussed at American Heritage Dictionary article rather than any individual articles of words! Manual of style explains article naming at better detail. Picking where to post is surprisingly tricky, no?

Hope this helps. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 21:48, 10 September 2006 (UTC)