User talk:Bluemarine/Archive 1

Welcome
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -GTBacchus(talk) 05:49, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Identity
I am in fact Matt Sanchez. Matthew.a.sanchez@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluemarine (talk • contribs) 07:13, March 26, 2007
 * Section header/formatting added by Elonka 00:36, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Caution
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Aatombomb 01:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Editing an article about yourself
There seems to be some indication that you are in fact Matt Sanchez. If so, please review and follow Wikipedia's policies on editing one's own biography and on conflict of interest. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 16:38, 25 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The two problematical items you mentioned on my talk page aren't in the article anymore, so hopefully they are no longer an issue. As you know, it's pretty much impossible to keep inaccuracies out of an article; the best that can be hoped for is that they are promptly removed.  (In that regard, I just removed a category, in the article, related to one of the two items you mentioned.)


 * In general, negative information about a person if it lacks a reliable source can be removed "on sight", per WP:BLP. If you do need to remove such information in the future, and run into any resistance, please feel free to drop me a note; I'll be happy to help on that or anything else I can.


 * As far as anything else, please note that I'm just another editor here. I do hope you find the policies above to reasonable.  -- John Broughton  (♫♫) 19:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Just want to add to what John Broughton said--I'm really trying to work on getting this article NPOV, and the insertion of unrelated images and unsourced anecdotes are just making it harder (not to mention probably inviting more anonymous attack edits). I happen to think there is no need for this article at all; that it was tossed up as a blogosphere-directed hit, but as long as it's here I want to make it as fair as is possible. FYI, John Broughton is extremely fair and isn't part of the groups inserting weasel words and libelous statements. Seriously, take his advice. :) --Beth C. 20:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Matt, first I think words such as 'escorts' are giving you the benefit of the doubt to begin with: maybe nothing more than a full-body massage happens in exchange for $300/hour. However, I find it strange that in articles you allegedly wrote and said "I'm not denying it" and "it happened over ten years ago" that you would turn around and now deny it completely, conveneniently as a "don't ask, don't tell" military investigation has opened up. For someone who has courted controversy, this about-face when the wind changes direction is quite stunning.→ R Young {yak ł talk } 05:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:MattSanchez.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MattSanchez.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 20:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Violations of policy
Please stop adding information to the article Matt Sanchez.

Per Autobiography, ''It is difficult to write neutrally about yourself. Therefore, it is considered proper on Wikipedia to let others do the writing. Instead, contribute material or make suggestions on the article's talk page and let independent editors write it into the article itself.''

In particular, unreferenced (and quite possibly unverifiable) statements such as these, which you added, are inappropriate:


 * An autodidact, Sanchez has been able to both acquire several languages and pen articles in those languages


 * Lovingly referred to as Refer Mechs, Marines claim the jack of all trades combat engineers have the most important job in the Corps: Keeping the beer


 * Matt Sanchez was known for being especially muscular. His fellow Marines asked him to move a refrigeration unit without a crane. Rumor has it, that he did just that. There are also reports that his arms (19") did not fit well into his Marine camies and that the sleeves needed to be tailored to accommodate his girth.

Please let other editors evaluate what is appropriate to add to your article: It is impossible for you to have a neutral point of view. And please not the per WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collector of facts; we don't put everything that is known about a person into that person's biography.

If you continue to add information to your own, article, you may be blocked for violating Wikipedia policy. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

March 2007
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Matt Sanchez. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Real96 06:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. WjBscribe 23:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Neutrality
'''There's no neutrality here. The bloggers are breaking their own rules. I added a different interview with Kevin McCullough. ''' You have not been at all neutral. The LGBT community wishes to publicly assassinate me, and you insist that I have no neutrality.

I suggest we post the longer, more thorough Kevin McCullough advertisement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluemarine (talk • contribs) 07:08, March 28, 2007

Name-Calling
Jihadist because people have issued a fatwa because gay men, like yourself, who have a personal bias against me because you feel threatened by someone who doesn't agree with you.

My face is everywhere online. 00:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)Matt Sanchez

Matt,

Why do you insist on calling everyone a name ('jihadists,' 'these fags') that you don't agree with? First, I wouldn't be surprised if you were 'straight' but that would make you 'gay-for-pay' which means you performed gay acts for money...i.e. 'prostitution.' You said yourself that 'pornography is prostitution' which by YOUR definition makes you a (fill in the blank).

Notably, you call people 'faceless cowards' when in fact their faces appear online. Hmmm. You complain of bias but you break every rule to push an agenda which is itself biased, contorted, distorted, and totally unsupportable. I think you must be enjoying the attention. If so, keep it up.→ R Young {yak ł talk } 04:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

'''LGBT and some of the other homo bloggers have been extremely biased. I'm sure you've noticed their bias. '''Bluemarine 23:56, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Matt Sanchez

Nomination for deletion
I nominated an article that you created, Matt Sanchez, for deletion. If you think that the article is salvageable, or that I'm mistaken, please comment on its deletion page. Please see the Guide to deletion if you have any questions about Wikipedia's deletion process. -- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chidom (talk • contribs).

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Lerner bio.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Lerner Bio.jpg. The copy called Image:Lerner Bio.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 14:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Max blumenthal.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Max Blumenthal.jpg. The copy called Image:Max Blumenthal.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 14:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Bjorn1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bjorn1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 12:06, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Jamesbake.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Jamesblake.jpg. The copy called Image:Jamesblake.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 14:02, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Matt Sanchez
DYK info like that doesn't go on the article page. Plus, that info needs to be sourced. Further, unless you are an admin, you shouldn't add the protected templates. Please stop adding this to the article. MECU ≈ talk 14:16, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:SanchezWithCoulter-w.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:SanchezWithCoulter-w.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU ≈ talk 14:24, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Your talk page
Hi. Please do not use your talk page (this page here) as a draft space for your articles. It is needed for others to communicate with you. You have unlimited draft space in your user space; just create pages like User:Bluemarine/My New Article. Sandstein 18:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Please read your messages! You are disrupting this talk page by posting the article about you on it. If you want to experiment with it, please to this somewhere else in your user space! Sandstein 18:48, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Please read this warning, or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia
Most of your image uploads lack any source and/or licencing information. Please clean these images up immediately by adding the correct tags, or have them deleted by adding the db-author tag. If you fail to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia because of persistent copyright violations. Sandstein 18:30, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * In reply to your question, please see WP:TAGS. In short, if the image is copyrighted by someone else, you must provide a fair use tag (see how-to). If you created the image, then the tag you apply to the image determines its licence. In either case, you must specify the source of the image (e.g. a weblink, or "own work"). Sandstein 05:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!
 Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can [ watchlist it] if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including WPMILHIST Announcements there.
 * Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].
 * The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, offline publication, article improvement contests, and other tasks.
 * We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
 * We've developed a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Carom 18:35, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Bluemarine for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — superbfc  [  talk  |  cont  ] — 18:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Ridiculous, if anything I have been far too blatant. I've never once denied my identity. Who are you?Matt Sanchez 03:28, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Cpl Tyler Rock
I have added a "" template to the article Cpl Tyler Rock, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Smokizzy 00:21, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Civility
Perhaps if you didn't spend your time gay-baiting, people would have more sympathy for you. From your posts here, you clearly have a lot to learn about politics. Aatombomb 01:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Attombomb you're such a cowardly effete. Matthew Sanchez 03:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Matt, you should read WP:Civil. People can be blocked for comments like the one's you're making on the Talk page of your article.Wjhonson 03:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Matt, I second this comment by Wjhonson. Please watch the personal attacks. I understand how this is a complicated issue, to say the least, but personal attacks are not tolerated, from anyone. --JoanneB 03:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Joanne, please check the myriad comments that WhJohnson is making toward me. Matt Sanchez 04:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Matt, even so, please stay civil yourself. Others can be warned and eventually blocked for incivility and personal attacks as well, but you'll need to be more specific than to point to his contributions in general. Kind regards, --JoanneB 04:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

[Warning removed- not appropriate- WjBscribe 04:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)]

Another nameless oneMatthew Sanchez 03:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

[Warning removed- not appropriate- WjBscribe 04:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)]

Who are you and why aren't you signing off?Matthew Sanchez 03:25, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

You need to read the vandals who keep reposting on the entry on me. Matthew Sanchez 03:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Matt Sanchez
I see from your recent actions that you are unhappy with coverage about you on Wikipedia at Matt Sanchez. We take very seriously any comments from the subjects of articles that their content are untrue or not presented neutrally. Having looked at the article, I can see why you are concerned. I would like to discuss the contents of the article with you and the others involved so that a mutually agreed version can be reached. Int he meantime please do not edit war over the article.

I see you are keeping a draft of the article below, I am going to move it for you to User:Bluemarine/Sandbox, a dedicated page where you can edit it. This will allow this page to be used just for messages to you... WjBscribe 04:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I have protected the page to prevent further edit warring and so your concerns can be discussed fully. Note that my protection of the page is not necessarily an endorsement of its content at the time of protection. Please join in the discussions at Talk:Matt Sanchez so we can agree a version that conveys the relevant information neutrally and that you feel is as fair to you as possible. Thank you. WjBscribe 04:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It really is in your interest for you to comment on the article's talkpage about your issues with this article so we can work towards a version that is neutral and balanced. WjBscribe 04:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

May 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did here: Jeff Gannon. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 20:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)
The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:AravosisJohn.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AravosisJohn.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 18:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:DanaMilbanks.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DanaMilbanks.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

WP:AUTO
Matt, per WP:AUTO, may I please strongly advise that you avoid editing your bio at Matt Sanchez? The better way to handle this is to edit your sandbox version and then ask for those changes to be rolled in to the main bio. Thanks, Elonka 00:56, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

OOOPPPSSS
sorry, but I couldn't access my sandbox Matt Sanchez 01:10, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Vengeful nature
Matt is compiling a history of being vindictive and angry. His comments on articles he's edited including his own prove that. I think he should be banned from Wikipedia until he can contribute in a civil and respectful way. If this behavior continues I will go to the editors of Wikipedia to see what they can do. Fair warning.

All trolls are requested to sign their normally anonymous postings. Thank you Matt Sanchez 05:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I most likely disagree with much about Matt Sanchez' politics, but I think it is nonsense to try and ban him for editing an article about him. That would be Orwellian: we have made an article about you that includes what you think is derogatory information, and we are banning you from fixing it.  The suggestions that he not edit the article himself but edit his sandbox version and ask others to place it in to the article are understandable, meant well, but also nonsense.  Let's just make it difficult for the actual person to edit articles about themselves while making it easy for unidentified people and people we know nothing about to edit freely. 71.39.78.68 14:15, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Bjorn.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bjorn.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 20:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Cpl Rock.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Cpl Rock.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Strangerer (Talk) 09:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:AndrewSullivan.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:AndrewSullivan.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Yonatan talk 14:37, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Morocco.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Morocco.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)
The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:26, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Signing posts on talk pages
Remember to sign posts on talk pages with four tildes. Especially note that when creating or posting in more than one section at a time, it is helpful to sign in each section where you post. --Aleta 21:45, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Personal attacks
Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Throttle down the personal attacks. Regardless of your personal history with some of the other editors, calling them "screwed up fags" and "disgusting sodomites" is NOT acceptable. Another editor just came off of an involuntary wikibreak due to incivility; if you don't calm down, you'll be doing the same. Horologium t-c 01:45, 22 June 2007 (UTC)


 * It's not the first time either. He personally attacked me too on several occasions. Aatombomb 03:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Tone, avoiding personal attacks
You really need to watch your tone when contributing. I realise that you are under a lot of pressure (from one attack site in particular) and that the present content of your article here causes you stress, but you need to be careful in how you express yourself. Baiting other editors is not helpful... WjBscribe 05:09, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


 * And so we're utterly clear, however much you may feel provoked, attacks such as these- and  on another editor are completely unacceptable. As is using derogatory terms about others' sexual orientation. Attacks of that nature in future, regardless of provocation, will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of time. WjBscribe 05:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problems

 * Image:Dinkins.jpg has been listed at Copyright problems because it appears to be a copy of the official portrait. There is insufficient documentation of the source, and I assume you did not actually paint this portrait yourself, as the current license tag claims. -- Beland 09:57, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:Lerner1.jpg has been listed for deletion because it is not used in any articles. Also, there is no supporting documentation for the claim that this image is available under the GFDL (such as a URL pointing to a declaration from Columbia University of this license for this image). -- Beland 09:57, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)
The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

User:Mattsanchez
Could you confirm whether this account is yours? WjBscribe 16:21, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

User identifying as Blue Marine and Matt Sanchez
I don't have proof that you are or aren't Matt Sanchez but your pervasive and prolific posting on multiple topics are disruptive and that you are the subject of the article easily borders on violating WP protocols. Please read up on Autobiography and Disruptive editing. Please note: I'm not accusing you of either of these but I believe your voluminous comments on the talk pages fly in the face of the policies and do violate the spirit of cooperation needed to produce good articles.
 * I suggest that you

1. "chill" and when you do repost keep it civil and productive. If another editor(s) are adding unverified statements or information supported only by blogosphere rumors it will be deleted. It might not happen immediately but there are a lot of folks watching the page so it should happen rather soon. 2. Focus instead on adding the material you think is missing and should be included. Providing the weblink directly to the source and it's easy enough for someone else to start to sort it out. 3. Work on some other articles. Biographies of living people are notoriously back and forth processes that take time. You may have noticed that I have yet to make a big edit on yours since I haven't had the time to read through everything that's already happened and I've been working on other articles. You can do the same, although you're a near-expert on yourself you could easily contribute to other articles just as well. Benjiboi 20:21, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It's kind of funny that you were editing the article for Scott Thomas Beauchamp under a pseudonym. You were intimately involved with the controversy, you have a clear opinion, and you were adding your own website as a reference. Because you used the name Bluemarine I did not realize what you were doing. Using blog references is not permitted, and it seems even more egregious that you were linking to your own blog. A headline by Bluemarine (you) states that the Omission of Matt Sanchez is astounding, but because you didn't want others to realize that you were promoting yourself, you used the third person. Next time you promote yourself on wikipedia (an obvious show of bias), perhaps you should know what you're getting into and not be so "astounded" when it's removed.Athene cunicularia 13:53, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop personal attacks
Posting "I'm just a paranoid, conspiracy, unhappy, unattractive homosexual who has lost too much money on escorts who obviously aren't interested in me" violate Wikipedia's civility and personal attacks policies. Please stop. Benjiboi 20:06, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

More personal attacks
Please stop your personal attacks. They are unwarranted and violate WP policies. You have called me a "gay porn groupie" and "homosexual with an ax to grind" adding "There's nothing "balanced and neutral" about this guy." In addition you collectively called the article editors "catty gay men" and "sodomites." If you are unable to constructively and peacefully participate in the talk pages processes avoiding disruptive behavior and personal attacks then you should put your energies into other articles of interest to you. Benjiboi 21:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Enough
Our policies against personal attacks are not optional. I am extremely loathed to prevent someone about whom we have an article from editing this website, but if you continue in these attacks you will leave me no choice. There is absolutely no need for you to comment on other contributors, your speculations about people's sexual orientation or pornographic preference are out of line. Consider this the last warning you will receive, another personal attack and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of time - you can make representations about your article via email if that happens. WjBscribe 21:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I concur with WJBscribe. On the one hand, I very much want Sanchez to be able to continue to participate at the talkpage of his own bio.  On the other, Sanchez has engaged in multiple personal attacks and sexual slurs.  Numerous requests, both on- and off-wiki, have been made to Sanchez to cease with this behavior, and yet he continues.  If it happens again, I would support a block. --Elonka 21:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I also agree. This has gone far enough. I will support a block the next time someone's sexual orientation is made an issue. Horologium t-c 22:19, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Is there some part of don't comment on contributors you aren't getting? WjBscribe 12:18, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Beauchamp.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Beauchamp.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 23:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:MichaelTotten.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:MichaelTotten.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:MichaelTotten.jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:MichaelTotten.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:29, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Scottthomas.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Scottthomas.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

== Military history WikiProject coordinator selection ==

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Kirill 02:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Scottthomas.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Scottthomas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Wandalstouring 09:06, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Persistence
This page is crammed with clashes! I salute your noble aims. DMCer 03:14, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

You asked
You wanted me back, you got me back. Aatombomb 00:41, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)
The August 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:4cavalry.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:4cavalry.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:05, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:IPFlagIraq.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:IPFlagIraq.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 18:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Corrected
As last time, I have moved your draft of the article about you to a subpage (you can find it at User:Bluemarine/Draft) so this page can continue to be used by those wishing to contact you. WjBscribe 12:02, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Bias
Editing your own biography on Wikipedia isn't biased? Aatombomb 03:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
You have been told numerous times that it is inappropriate for you to edit the article about yourself. It violates a number of Wikipedia policies - WP:AUTO and WP:COI - and will only inflamme the disputes surrounding the Matt Sanchez article. Please desist. WjBscribe 11:59, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

A Request
If you wish to engage in dialogue, please do so on my talk page and not on my user page. Furthermore, I would appreciate it if you would stop referring to me as a 'gay activist.' I have never engaged in any form of activism for gay causes. Aatombomb 23:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 11:56, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

RFC
Hey Bluemarine, there is an RFC (request for comment) about you. See Requests for comment/Bluemarine. <font color="Blue"> Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake)  00:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The reason for the Request for Comment is set out in the RFC summary here. Your input would be appreciated.Typing monkey 18:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

September, 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jack Venice
Jack Venice, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Jack Venice satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Jack Venice and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Jack Venice during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 05:15, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * To specify: I don't disagree that this is a current national news story, this deletion request is based on the text and intent of Wikipedia policy on biographies of living people. It is too early to tell if the story has legs and the adult film actor involved isn't notable on his own. Regards, ˉˉanetode╦╩ 05:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Ongoing attacks
Once again, however provoked you feel, personal attacks such as those made in this post are unacceptebale. Comment on content, not other contributors. WjBscribe 21:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Spamming
Spamming the Talk:Matt Sanchez page isn't going to help you settle anything. Aatombomb 04:41, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Test article
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. NawlinWiki 20:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I think what you're trying to do is work on the Adam Kokesh article in userspace. I have therefore moved Adam Kokesh/googlea2c18a1566e08036.html to User:Bluemarine/Adam Kokesh.  Please don't post any more articles with the long nonsense titles. NawlinWiki 20:42, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello
You may have noticed my edits to the talk page of the article about you. As a Wikipedia administrator my personal background has no bearing upon my sysop decisions; I made the following disclosures to avoid any appearance of impropriety: You can Google my username pretty quickly and learn enough to confirm with the alumni office (CC '90). Here at Wikipedia we aim to help new users adjust to site standards. You've gotten off on the wrong foot and perhaps dialog will help. I can be reached through the following link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Emailuser/Durova
 * I am a Columbia University graduate.
 * I am a United States Navy veteran.

Bear in mind that there's nothing partisan about this offer. I just happen to have walked a few (nautical) miles in the similar moccasins and I hope there's a friendly way to straighten things out. I'll probably recuse myself from actual use of sysop tools regarding this conflict, but I may request review and intervention by uninvolved administrators if that becomes necessary. My hope is that perhaps that won't be necessary and the parties can settle the issues amicably. Durova Charge! 01:05, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)
The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:04, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 22:51, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

It's More Complicated Than You Think
Hi Matt,

Yes I realize that controversy for you drives book sales. Great. "Taliban of Tolerance." I couldn't care less, so long as the other side gets equal time to share their views.

Just for your information...I'm a Republican who voted for Bush...three times (1992, 2000, 2004). What I care about is factual accuracy. I admired you at first for admitting the truth...because until we can admit the truth, we cannot be free. However, I see that after the forces that be (i.e. the military's 'don't ask, don't tell' policy) came around---forces that favor the telling of lies, forces that expect Larry Craig to remain in anonymous public restrooms, well then the story line changed. I am an historian and there's nothing worse to an historian to re-write history to make it less honest in order to pander to certain groups...right, left, or anywhere in between.

And no, I never bought any of your videos. Sorry! Ryoung122 09:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

I wrote the Taliban of Tolerance because it's true, not controversial. Matt Sanchez (talk) 22:38, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Indefinite block
Per No legal threats for this edit. Durova Charge! 03:42, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Is it clear from that edit that he is making a legal threat to a user? If its clear based on other information, then Bluemarine isn't his only username. <font color="#008080">Avruch Talk 14:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll put that on Matt's shoulders to clarify. And if it was directed at another editor, I'll also lift this block if he withdraws it.  Site policy is strict in this respect, but the situation is easy to rectify.  And BTW Bluemarine isn't his only username.  But that's neither here nor there.  Durova Charge! 14:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

To request unblocking:

* IP address: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:88.73.124.33 * Blocking admin: Durova * Block reason: legal threat * Block originally applied to: Bluemarine * Your account name (if you have one): * An explanation of why your block is unfair:

I'm not sure what part of my edit was a legal threat, please advise.Matt Sanchez 14:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Your very short post wrote, Pending legal action. The context was unclear.  Policy takes a very hard line if, for example, that was a threat to initiate legal action against Wikipedia or another editor.  If, on the other hand, you intend to pursue legal action against some news source used for this article, then the usual venue for getting related material removed from the page would be to file an OTRS request.  You could also ask for impartial review and assistance at the biographies of living persons noticeboard.  The article also falls within the scope of five different WikiProjects (linked from the top of the talk page).  You could contact them and ask for assistance watchlisting the page.  Basically all I ask in order to lift tihs block is either clarification that this wasn't a legal threat or a withdrawal of the statement if it was.  If you actually pursue legal action that's your own business of course; please don't discuss it onsite.  Durova Charge! 14:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Bluemarine for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

See. I highly advise you to read up on legit and illegit uses of socks, see WP:SOCK. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 00:13, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Unblock
Per clarification. Thank you. Durova Charge! 22:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)
The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 13:33, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Policy problems
Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as described here, you may be blocked. Samuell 00:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

See this edit. Samuell 15:51, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

The link above is an edit difference, your edit can be seen at the top right of the page. Thanks Samuell 22:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi

Talk pages are meant for discussion about the article, not as a place for general things and issues, just a heads up. Samuell (talk) 22:54, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

The article is a current article. You didn't mention "general things and issues"? you mentioned "insults" What are you talking about? and why are you threatening me with blocking? My comments have noting to do with your blocking. I was only aware you had been blocked after you were unblocked, I never said anything about insults. I am not theartening you with blocking, just warning, I used this template 	. Samuell (&#91;&#91;User_talk:Samuell&#124;Lift me up or put me down&#93;&#93;) (talk) 23:41, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

I was sending you a warning about doing what you did, maybe I should have used I milder template. Maybe could could say I was threatening you (though not in the personal threats manner, because I didn't threaten you with harm), I see it more as telling you that blocking is a possibility for this offense (while it is minor, it can be a annoyance and can be considered vandalism if a user has been warned before). I asked you to stop, it appears you did, you would only have been blocked if you had continued to do so. As far as I can see the issue is close. Thank you. Samuell (Lift me up or put me down) 00:47, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Samuell - the article in question has a section titled "Articles / opinion pieces". Bluemarine was adding an article he published on the talk page so that admins (who can edit the article) might consider it for inclusion within this already established list.  Unlike your warning on this talk page, the link and summary are fully appropriate under the circumstances.  Please be more careful in the future. Rklawton (talk) 01:06, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

I don't think Samuell knows what he was doing, beside trying to censure me in some way. Even then, I'm not even sure over what he's concerned because he refuses to state it. Matt Sanchez (talk) 21:37, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

talk.
I've deleted this page, as. The content you might be looking for could be at User:Xoloz/UBX/User Christian. — xaosflux  <sup style="color:#00FF00;">Talk  03:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Fob Falcon
Hey man, how long were you at Falcon? I was there as a Psyop team member for 2-506 and 2-12 in Dora, for a year I just got back in april. I was there for the AHA incident. Good work on that Baghdad diarist douchebag!--70.139.8.255 (talk) 05:50, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

I got to know Dora pretty well too. When I first got there, if you went out on a six hour patrol you would find at least 2 bodies. My team's record for most bodies found in a patrol was 9. When I left we didn't find bodies on patrols that much. It was a huge improvement. Dora market was coming back and people were starting to come back from exile. It's funny, when I got there Dora was known as a "mixed area", Sunnis, Shittes, Christians, but most of the time I was there it was only Sunnis I met. It is so great to be back in the states and hear about the area getting better.

Falcon was accually a pretty laid back Fob while I was there, but just before I left 4th brigade moved there and the whole vibe of th Fob changed to one of high stress. It was no diffrent from being at Fob Liberty.--70.139.8.255 (talk) 08:04, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 09:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Italics
Instead of using the italics HTML tag (), use a pair of single quotes to begin italics () and another pair to end the italics. If you insist on using the HTML, please use a close tag ('') to end the italics, otherwise you end up italicizing everything on the page from that point on, which is just as annoying as the overuse of boldface I just used. I hate having to edit someone else's comments because of careless formatting, and I've had to do it several times in the past few days. If you want to italicize your signature, do it in your preferences. Horologium t-c 18:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

WP:CIVIL
Here's the deal. We've got a policy regarding civil behavior here. You've gotten away with a lot more incivility than most administrators are willing to put up with, and your edits are becoming counterproductive. If you wish to make recommendations for changes to your article, please feel free. However, if you are going to use your article's talk page for a platform to attack other editors - or anyone else for that matter, I will not hesitate to block your account from editing. Conversely, I will make similar warnings to other editors and hold them to the same standard. However, this is not an invitation for you to complain about other editor's comments. Leave that to me and other administrators to sort out. Instead, I wish to encourage you to focus on making meaningful and useful recommendations regarding the content of your article. Rklawton 23:27, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * This is the sort of edit you must stop making if you wish to be permitted to edit Wikipedia. Rklawton 21:14, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

This is what you're talking about?

"Jmark, you have credibility issues. You've made no attempts at re-writes, you're obviously hostile, and just a little too motivated to gratuitously smear me. You should be banned from contributing given your uncivil, unprofessional and unhelpful 'insight'"

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)
The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 01:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Davidbrock.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Davidbrock.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:55, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

/archive1