User talk:Bluesfan86

February 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Shooter (2007 film) has been reverted. Your edit here to Shooter (2007 film) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.discogs.com/release/10323341-Mark-Mancina-Shooter-Music-From-The-Motion-Picture) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:25, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to NoLay have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:36, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: NoLay was changed by Bluesfan86 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872859 on 2022-02-21T08:36:02+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aakansha Trivedi (talk) 08:52, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Hello, I think that if you review my recent edits you will concur with the judgements. I am simply removing unreliable sources from these articles that appear from sources that do not meet wikipedia's notability requirements. Thank you! Bluesfan86 (talk) 08:55, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I would recommend you add a Template:Better source needed instead. Include the reason= field explaining why it fails RS. Have you looked for a discussion on the archives at Reliable sources/Perennial sources? Cheers Adakiko (talk) 09:18, 21 February 2022 (UTC)