User talk:Bluesfyre

Mike Manning
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mike Manning, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Mike Manning. Nephron T|C 01:49, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Reverts of Campbellford
Hi Bluesfyre,

I do not think that Mike Manning is notable (WP:N) and have proposed deletion (WP:AFD. You are welcome to join the discussion at Articles_for_deletion/Log/2008_March_12.

Are you familiar with Wikipedia policy on notability (WP:N), spam (WP:SPAM)) and external links (WP:EL)?

I ask as I disagree with your reverts({revert1}{revert2}) of Campbellford and believe they violate policy. Please read the policy. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Nephron T|C 05:05, 12 March 2008 (UTC)