User talk:Bluesum

re
understand, Bluesum, that some of the guys hint admin positions. they are not even in the domain which fight is notable or not. kickboxing is low popular in united states, it is not UFC, since Las Vegas stopped to have a K-1 Grand Prix. these guys destroyed all of our work, even deleting K-1 events and lately SuperKombat, which in this moment is the second promotion in the world after It's Showtime. K-1's future is insecure, but there are other European promotions like It's Showtime, SuperKombat, United Glory. too bad they destroy our work... some hint positions while others are probably not in domain!

JSmith is updating the Dutch organisations It's Showtime and United Glory, while I am updating the Romanian one, Local Kombat and SuperKombat (SuperKombat is new Local Kombat now because they work with WAKO-pro not with WKN anymore). from the last 3, they started to delete articles. first article deleted from Local Kombat or SuperKombat and im out from here. it is like they laugh of my work! and im volunteer here...

they dont respect work in one word! it is like me contesting the articles of some rockers, when i have absolutely no idea of the phenomen. :)

the problem is that Libstar is calling other users to comment for deletion.

Cyperus

Welcome!

 * }

Re: Inquiry
I don't have anything against admins posting their opinion on AFDs, or anything against admins in general. SwisterTwister  talk  05:24, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: Injury/Admin
Bluesum, I’ve gotta say apart from the recent surge AfD nominations of kickboxing pages I haven’t been hugely involved with the process. I tend to prefer to create pages rather than argue over nominations and find this the biggest turn off about Wikipedia (coupled with people who know nothing about the subject coming in and nominating). In terms of Admin the only experience I knowingly have had is when my page(s) got deleted and they (admin) said that they were considering blocking me – not that I had any warning. To be honest I don’t expect to be involved in any of these deletion discussions in the future and think they have resulted in a loss of editors/a reduction of new editors. Sorry I couldn’t help more. Thanks. jsmith006 (talk) 15:35, 10 July 2011
 * You asked about admins on AFD. It is usually an admin who closes an AFD. Sometimes a non-admin closes a noncontroversial one. Only admins can actually delete an article if the consensus is for deletion, or undelete it if that is appropriate. Otherwise an admin has no special authority nor is any special attention given to his views. Wikipedia is pretty egalitarian, and deletionists or inclusionists are often quite savage and rude in their condemnation of an admin who has a view different from theirs in an AFD. My own participation in AFDs was commented on favorably in my Admin approval process. Edison (talk) 19:11, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Regarding a query of yours from a few months back
Is this still pertinent? --MZMcBride (talk) 20:17, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah. I'm not sure whether this query bothers you a lot. Perhaps you can show me the result if it isn't too troublesome to get it. Thanks a lot. Bluesum (talk) 12:03, 28 August 2011 (UTC)