User talk:Bluetuliproseread

A tag has been placed on Blue Tulip Rose Read, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- lucasbfr talk 23:38, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

NPOV
Howday and welcome to Wikipedia. I saw your edits to the Bramhall High School. Unfortunately, Wikipedia can not post personal complaints or opinions about topics (except those by, and cited to, notable critics). As such I was forced to revert your changes. Check out WP:NPOV for more information about the neutral point of view policy. Thanks, --TeaDrinker 00:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I see you have changed it back. I will start a discussion on the talk page of the article.  Repeatly reverting may put you in violation of the three revert rule.  Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:Bramhall High School rather than reverting it back.  Thanks, --TeaDrinker 00:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * You have made another revert on the article. PLEASE discuss on the talk page; you may be blocked for additional reverts.  I have outlined my concerns on the talk page; there is no harm in discussing the issues there, particularly with regard to the neutral point of view policy.  Thanks, --TeaDrinker 00:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Blue Tulip Rose Read
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Blue Tulip Rose Read, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 17:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)