User talk:Bluexepnos

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 15:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia content must be based on reliable sources
Please read WP:RELIABILITY and don't add content that is not based on reliable sources, as you did on Ursula Haverbeck. Thanks. Chrisahn (talk) 20:12, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

The author of the photo said anyone can use it. And it's a photo. How can a photo be "unreliable"? Do you think someone edited it or something? Bluexepnos (talk) 04:18, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I think what means is that there are no reliable sources connecting the photo to the subject of the article. Therefore adding it would introduce unverified information. Cheers! —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 06:18, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, okay, that's fair enough, so if I find a reliable article which has that picture of her, it would be okay?
 * Also, I'll move this to the talk page, so reply there Bluexepnos (talk) 12:13, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, I just saw the source you posted on the talk page, and I now think you may be right. It's strange though, there are many places that label that pic as her, and there is some resemblance. I'm not 100% sure but it has certainly provided enough doubt that I agree that it should be left down. Sorry for my mistake, it was an honest errorBluexepnos (talk) 12:22, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, there are lots of people who claim that's a photo of Haverbeck, but none of them have a shred of reliability. Most of them are Nazis or Nazi-sympathisers, which is correlated to their inability to distinguish fact from fiction. It only takes a few minutes to find the source of the image, and a bit more time to find the real name of the woman in the photo, her Facebook page, and a Facebook comment where she actually mocks those who believe the photo shows Haverbeck. (I won't publish any of that for privacy concerns.) Chrisahn (talk) 12:33, 16 November 2019 (UTC)