User talk:Blugrant15

June 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. →Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  17:02, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Sorry but my intention is to update the Ms Earth 2014 section as I have reliable sources. I suggest you check my sources or visit the official fb of the Ms Earth Pageant for more updates and to verify that what I'm adding is a fact . Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blugrant15 (talk • contribs) 04:32, 4 June 2014‎ (UTC)


 * Facebook and forums aren't reliable source at all and cannot be used ..... I suggest you read WP:RELIABLE SOURCE. →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  04:05, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

ME 2014
Greetings, I spent a few days outside the country and I could not go to wikipedia. I understand your points and I'm glad you have interest in the article but particularly just what we are interested in the same.

Regarding Kyrgyzstan are quite right, expired and you reference a source that there is no mention of that country's candidate for Miss Earth.

Regarding Angola, your not specific about a clear and reliable reference, in fact investigated and not found it. But I just did right now and if I found a reliable reference. Remember not reference articles with no official facebook page as it leaves doubt its accuracy.

Peru, is "Miss Earth Peru 2013" not 2014, is not yet confirmed their participation so the withdrawal of candidate list until it is confirmed by a good reference.

The return from Egypt is not safe, the references that your colocastes is a Blog; and wikipedia does not allow the same as they are personal opinions, in this case the blog writer. This does not deny the return of Egypt but not added until there is a reliable reference.

The return of St Lucia as well as Egypt, are unreliable. I reiterate again that references the page "Miss Earth Pageant" on Facebook are unreliable. Have previously given information which was never confirmed.

In "Upcoming national pageants" most of the references are from "Miss Earth Pageant" which is not reliable. I invite you to investigate the same time you point there, but with other more formal website.

Reference Rodrigues Islands is also a blog, you need to find other references on it.

Thank you for adding the newly elected candidates but remember to place the reference to be valid. I advise not to use references Missology are generally false. Now change the article again, add references and correct the information. Jaam0121 (talk) 19:33, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

ME
Very good except for something your suggestion Rodrigues Island needs a safer reference, such as a national newspaper web justifying and certain of it. Good references that you added some candidates but remember that "Last compete" will not place the reference to the country if the candidate is elected ua, because it would be redundant. Greetings Jaam0121 (talk) 15:15, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss Earth 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saitama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

ME 2014
Hello, recently my contribution to revertiste item. What you do does not make sense, I'm trying to preserve order and the policy of this article. The reference to the participation of Fiji in Miss Earth NO RELIABLE and that takes away credibility. There is an official reference page of the contest? local press? I have not, and to constantly researched on the net and can not find anything credible. In fact you point the reference point of not even showing coronation of Queen or Miss Earth Fiji side which is even more doubtful. You agredezco I do not interfere in it respects policies where there is a strong reference gladly Fiji's participation is added; NO rest. Jaam0121 (talk) 00:56, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Greetings, it is not that I doubt your credibility but that statement is not public, it does not appear to the encyclopedia and therefore is not conducive place. Friend, Please be patient when you have proper reference, add it and gladly be included. Will reverse the changes, please no vintages information again; not believe an edit war that harms both.

Note: You add in upcoming national pageant Guadaloupe but thats pageant is for Miss World, International tourism, United continents; not for Miss Earth. Greetings! Jaam0121 (talk) 04:21, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Who's more credible?
the writer of the blog from the Miss earth organization is more credible than you. The writer's name is written as to give credit to him. You? you don;t even have your name or real identity. I would rather believe in a person working in the organization to someone pretending to know a lot but nothing.

MISS EARTH 2014
I understand what you say but still not justifiable. First, I do not think the article owner; I preserve the order just many anonymous users and anonymous as your not affect this type of refereer. You add a lot of good information, but also bad; and is not that what you support. Sorry, but the rules are clear wikipedia (do not follow me); Blogs are not reference security, I invite you to seek references from the local press or web news. And from what you say that if the writer of the Miss Earth Organization is more credible than me, do not deny nor affirm. Just as we are not aware b bibioteca community and therefore is not sure reference. Before start wikipedia remember to read all the rules for you to make good edits, and being suggested not think it's a whim, been a good. And over this demand respect and professionalism to the article and its taxpayers.

NOTE: The reference of Mongolia is safe, I admit. But where it says that the national final will be on July 14?. Reference Portugal, by contrast, is good and acceptable. Jaam0121 (talk) 15:39, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

MISS EARTH 2014 PROBLEMS
Please, more maturity and respect. First of all you are wrong, Taiwan as such is not in Miss Earth, but TAIPEI CHINA. Second, do not deny that the contest is done but these grounds that the reference is true because the official website of Miss Earth so provides; where? when? Might I attach?; especially when you'd be depending on the credibility of that reference to another which does not arise. Third, why the rush? this type of article are future and therefore are subject to change continually; despresurados need not be in the collection of information. I invite you to reflect and stop reverse edits, you have done excellent work but are useless if stains such events. As for what you say "You do not choose on matters here": Yes, it's true. But do remember that your not, and here is my best weapon leave as provided in the rules and policies of wikipedia, which you are not in compliance. Greetings. Jaam0121 (talk) 02:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The fact that Taiwan Taipe use China for political reasons, has absolutely nothing to do do with the contest. This country has the side "CHINESE TAIPEI" and you can not change something because that is the side which is granted. Still not justify what I raised you, your default is unsecured so the retreat. Respect and be more professional. When you get a clear, concise and reliable reference; be welcome; but by reversing the issues that you are generating an edit war. Jaam0121 (talk) 04:03, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

MISS EARTH 2014
Hello, now that sustituiste references for a more secure if credible and secure. But remember, do not remove your edits on a whim, just try to keep out such information as most likely to be false. Sounds good to keep contact with the official Facebook account of the event, however that does not appear because the information was supplied to you, but it is not published. Safe, clear and precise references is the most suitable.Jaam0121 (talk) 04:03, 08 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss Earth 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Miss Grand I
Hello, as you noticed change in many ways the article "Grand Miss International 2014" in their editions in English and Spanish. Were you able to delete the references noted that each candidate, Why?, I did it because there is a reference that covers all candidates and is the official website of the contest of this way the article takes away unnecessary burden and the truth is much more practical when adding candidates. At least in the edition in Spanish, a user added the recent candidate elected delete Mexico but, although I hope she was elected to the official website of the contest because the vintage is only a matter of time; is a more orderly way to do it. Jaam0121 (talk) 00:28, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss Earth 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Marcos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Miss Earth 2014
Hello Brugrant. Missology.info references untrusted, but data showing the candidates with their bands are acceptable. However, the official website of Miss Earth does not even show the template of the countries, as with others where at least goes empty because not yet been chosen participant. Will reverse the changes because Miss Earth page is the most official, also is a future article and is subject to change so as the participation of both nations to be placed on the portal, gladly add it. And remember to be careful when you reviertes editions, in addition to removal of Samoa and Tonga, had retired on "Crossovers" Yanuzzi Carolina (Argentina) who has not been confirmed yet. greetings :) Jaam0121 (talk) 15:06, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss Earth 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sidney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)