User talk:Blurrzuki

Re: Latin conjugation
Ahh, I recall that, yeah. If I remember right, the first edit was an enexplained blanking from an anonymous user (almost always reverted), but the second looked a lot more... good-faithy. The second one I would have not have reverted, except that the blanking had led me to believe you were a meanie. That one was a more iffy judgement call, so I hope you don't take offense to it. Anyway, I wish you nothing but luck. :) Thanks for taking the time to message me. Luna Santin 06:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Latin conjugation
I personally feel you have made the tables a lot more confusing than they used to be. My preferred version (except for miinor mispellings) is http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Latin_conjugation&oldid=66012862. I think it is much better that everything be put into one table rather than a separate one for each tense.


 * The tables didn't really teach anything, though, and they aren't that in depth. These appendices in Wiktionary are more of what you're looking for. They're excellent if you need brushing up.


 * http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary_Appendix:Latin_first_conjugation
 * http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary_Appendix:Latin_second_conjugation
 * http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary_Appendix:Latin_third_conjugation
 * http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary_Appendix:Latin_fourth_conjugation
 * http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary_Appendix:Conjugations


 * I thought that the article should be more explanatory and descriptive, rather than being a "guide" as it were. Unfortunately, all of the Romance languages' articles pertaining to conjugation are "guides," and look like Wiktionary appendices. In fact, the Wiktionary appendices are a lot better. Thanks for your concern, though. Please drop me another if you get anymore problems. --Blurrzuki 19:58, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Lagunabeach3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lagunabeach3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:27, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Hi,, thank you for applying for VandalProof. I am happy to announce that you are now authorized for use, so if you haven't already, simply download VandalProof from our main page and install it, and you're all set!

Please join the VandalProof user category by adding either:  (which will add this user box) or   to your user page.

If you have any queries, please feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page. Welcome to our team! - Gl e n 08:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Rockylaguna.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rockylaguna.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 02:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Roman-era mosaic.jpg


The file File:Roman-era mosaic.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)