User talk:Bm5481

Personal Attack Warning
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy: '''There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them.' Comment on content'', not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that you may be blocked for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. --Strothra 19:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

RE: Personal Attack Warning
Strosthraaf or whatver: you're an idiot. Bm5481 20:38, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. --Strothra 00:48, 18 May 2006 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Stop hand.svg|left|30px]]

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. --InShaneee 23:29, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Vandal Warning
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Do not remove warning tags. This is considered vandalism. Strothra 01:07, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

CH=53
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. - BillCJ 01:13, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry I misuderstood your additions to be vandalsim. I remove similar things all the time from articles, some surprisingly detailed, but still nonsense. I am not offended by the nickname, tho I don't use such language myself.

The major problem with it is that it is unsourced. Per WP:Verifiability, you have to have sources for anything added to Wikipedia. If you can find a source that mentions it, online or printed, then you can quote it. An online source would be best, as any user couldeasily look at the source themselves, but it is not required. Hope that clears things up for you, and sorry for jumping the gun on vandalism. - BillCJ 02:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)