User talk:Bmg916/Archive2

Wicked Cow Entertainment
After taking out Wicked Cow's client list and the description of what the company does, I do not feel the article was self-promotion. It would have been nice to have some constructive criticism on the page rather then just deleting it entirely.

Eddie Fatu
Well, I wouldn't consider that as "vandalizing" the page, I was simply adding an important detail to the career of Eddie Fatu. I must have misread the warning, because I thought that you cannot discuss matches not announced yet by WWE.com or on television. The "Battle of the Billionaires" match has been announced for weeks.

Great Start
Thanks for the Barnstar. It's nice to be recognized for the work that I put into this place. I may not write the encyclopedia, but I teach the newcomers to do so, which I feel is more beneficial in the longrun. BTW,

No problem, --  The  Hyb  rid  00:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

RE: Warnings
Yeah, I know what you mean. I think the most frustrating thing is when people try to add good things & AGF, but the way they type it is horrible. Then, someone like me comes along and trys to fix it. But then that user just reverts it. But hey, thats Wikipedia life. Cheers, —mikedk9109SIGN 20:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah, sh!t does happen, and I just try to aviod it as much as possible. Trust me, you don't want to get into anything with anyone on here. —mikedk9109SIGN 20:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I've been through almost everything on here. haha. Well, it depends, what do you wanty your sig to like? Like mine, or completely custom? —mikedk9109SIGN 21:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, what do you want it to look like? Font, color, etc. —mikedk9109SIGN


 * Here, hows this: Bmg916  —<b style="color:crimson; font-family:Eras Demi ITC;">mikedk9109</b><b style="color:black;">SIGN</b> 22:40, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * If you like that, then go to My preferences and paste this code in the sig box: <font color=#009900 face="Arial Black">Bmg916 Then check the "Raw signature" checkbox, click save, and your good to go. —<b style="color:crimson; font-family:Eras Demi ITC;">mikedk9109</b><b style="color:black;">SIGN</b> 22:48, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * No problem, I was glad to help you.If you ever need anything else, just drop me a line. —<b style="color:crimson; font-family:Eras Demi ITC;">mikedk9109</b><b style="color:black;">SIGN</b> 01:20, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

RE:Amy Zidian
I asked at the WP:PW talk page. Peace, --  The  Hyb  rid  21:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Christian's Nicknames
Twice you've removed them by reverting edits. And the second edit you reverted included no Christian Coalition stable rumors. What's up with that? 209.247.22.151 01:32, 10 February 2007 (UTC) Forgot to mention: since I'm not registered and don't have a user page, you might wanna reply in the Jason Reso (Christian) article's talk page.209.247.22.151 01:34, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for signing my autograph book! Cheers, —<b style="color:crimson; font-family:Eras Demi ITC;">mikedk9109</b><b style="color:black;">SIGN</b> 00:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Warning vandals
Hi there, I just noticed that you warned a vandal on User talk:69.231.84.127 twice since his last act of vandalism - see his contribs. You can only warn a vandal once until he vandalises again, otherwise we might as well give a full set of warnings in one go... I can see that you do loads of vandal-fighting, so this just probably slipped by, but thought I'd mention it. ConDem Talk 02:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. By the way, I often find that it gets a bit confusing when editors warn vandals for edits that somone else reverted. For example, I was just about to warn that user after my revert, then saw your warnings, and had to work out whether those warnings were for previous edits (and if so deserved a harsher warning) or whether they were for the new edits (in which case i didn't need to warn at all). I reckon that if we all stick to warning for the edits we reverted (unless its quite clear that the reverter isn't going to warn) then things get a lot less confusing! That sentence had so many sub-clauses, my head hurts. ConDem Talk 02:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

RE:Bat Award
Thanks, but I don't deserve it. I haven't exactly been calm about anything involved in that dispute. While I appreciate the award, I'll have to turn you down. Cheers, --  The  Hyb  rid  22:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, there wouldn't really be any point in accepting it. Anyone who would look into the archives of that talk page would be able to see the truth. Like you said though, at least I'm honest. Thanks, --  The  Hyb  rid  02:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

MVP/Ken Kennedy
Just like to give a quick thanks in correcting my mistakes on both MVP's and Ken Kennedy's articles. I was quick to jump to those conclusions whilst currently watch RAW. Again, thank you.--The Scourge 02:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Re:The Undertaker
The only reason I prefer the one currently being used is because it seems to at least have some evidence, whereas no matter how many places state 1962, none provides any evidence. Cheers, SteveLamacq43 14:18, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

RE: McMahon vs. Trump
The match was announced on RAW this week and on WWE.com so it is not speculative information. Check it yourself at the official WrestleMania website. Cheers! -- bullet proof  3:16 03:03, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You are misinterpreting what WP:PW and Wikipedia policy states. The WP:PW warnings say not to add matches that have not been announced yet on US television or WWE.com. -- bullet proof  3:16 03:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * In this case the matches were announced on WWE.com and on RAW this week. -- bullet proof  3:16 03:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I suggest you should discuss this with other members of WP:PW in the project's talk page to see what they think. -- bullet proof  3:16 03:17, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Bobby Lashley
Why is everyone reverting the PPVs. I am covering the points and PPVs in the last paragraph. Can we at least keep it that way? You made that last paragraph loose worse. :( I have had enough of this stupid edit war. All points where covered, No Way Out was covered. Now you removed them all. So wrong, Govvy 19:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * sheds a tear* :~( You're never know, he might have to retire next week! Then we would have to add it because of his short lived career! Govvy 19:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Ortiz
Okay. I am trying to figure out how to cite. I'm sorry that the encyclopedia has changed since the last time I was on it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Now the cite that states the info is already on the page. He says this in the Baltimore Sun interview. I just don't know how to cite this. It would help if you could help me cite this or wait till I figure it out. Thanks!!!! User:MgHoneyBee.

As I told you before it is the Baltimore Sun interview.http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/bal-ortizqa1218,0,3366285.story?coll=bal-sports-headlines. I think there is more on the page than on the actual URL that I have. Sorry for the inconvenience and misunderstanding.User: MgHoneyBee

Thanks for the help. I think next time I'll have better luck in getting the info cited. Thanks again. User:MgHoneyBee

WM 23
Mr. Kennedy defeated Sabu in a MITB Qualifier about 20 minutes ago. TJ Spyke 03:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The edit warning wasn't towards you, it was towards the earlier editor. TJ Spyke 03:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Um, why did you put Austin in before it was official? I hit enter the second that Austin's music played, so you must have done it before that (which would be against the rules). TJ Spyke 03:10, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I asked because I have dealt with this problem in the past, people entering what they assume is about to happen (it's especially annoying with title changes, since some people will post the new champ before the ref makes the 3 count). TJ Spyke 03:14, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Kool-Aid
The very angry person that you were replying to sounded like he could use an idea for a tasty drink to cool himself off, so I decided to give him an idea ;). Peace, 声  援  --  The   Hyb  rid  06:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Rock/Booker
The Rock was the first wrestler of Afro-American heritage to win a World Title in WWE.

Yes, Duane Johnson is 1/2 Samoan, but that doesn't matter to the discussion.

Look at Halle Barry for example, when she won her Oscar, she was considered the first black woman to win one. (even though she has a white mother.)

In Sports or in Hollywood, if you are at least 1/2 black, then that is good enough for them to consider you the first black whatever to do whatever.

Ohgltxg 22:58 9 March, 2007 (UTC)

Rock was first, period.

Everybody else (whether half, 3/4, or full blooded) comes after.

I wouldn't bother listing Booker as the first "full blooded" black champion, because then you open yourself up to nitpicking and everybody will bring up the Rock all over again.

Ohgltxg 23:09 9 March (UTC)

JBL, a potential Grand Slam Champion
I notice you keep taking ou tthe paragraph about JBL on the Grand Slam page. As he is listed on the Triple Crown Page I don't see the sense in taking him off the Grand Slam page as listing him on both is down to one issue, the validity of the US title and whether or not it can be considered a substitute for the IC title. I think it is better to keep him on both pages and explain why he is not currently considered a Triple Crown/Grand Slam champion rather than leave him off both and leave the matter open to vandals. Darrenhusted 19:41, 10 March 2007 (UTC)