User talk:Bmicomp

 ''Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~ at the end. If you would like to make comments on my Wikipediaing in general (positive or negative), feel free to do so on my own Request For Comments page. [ Start a new talk topic.]''

Welcome Back
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. — xaosflux  Talk 22:49, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

WikiKitteh of Understanding
Thank you for your understanding in deciding to withdraw your re-admin request. It shows real maturity.

Hasteur (talk) 00:17, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 

I came here to basically say the same thing, the kitten did not occur to me. I sincerely hope that after a couple weeks of activity the community comes to its senses and you get your admin bit back without controversy. Chillum 00:42, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

In the meantime I have turned on your rollback right. Chillum 00:43, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * ++Welcome back.  Wifione  Message 06:22, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

CAMERON, OKLAHOMA, USA
I am a resident of Cameron Oklahoma and a student at Poteau High School and I am trying to help the page <ref name=Cameron, Oklahoma by adding it's nickname "The pothole capital of the world." It is called that by locals of the Poteau, Cameron, Pocola area please quit removing my edits just because you think they are vandalism because they are not ~ Hosssawyer 9-3-14 22:18 CST — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hosssawyer (talk • contribs) 03:19, 4 September 2014

Un-reviewing Geraldine L. Richmond
Hey BMIcomp,

I stalk 's talk page and was curious as to why you un-reviewed the aforementioned page. Best, Airplaneman   ✈  00:54, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * That was unintentional, sorry about that and thanks for bringing it to my attention. I've marked it as reviewed again.   BMIComp  04:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * No problem. Take care, Airplaneman   ✈  00:42, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Clamtrek
Hello Bmicomp, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Clamtrek to a proposed deletion tag. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. GB fan 12:34, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Looks like a WP:CSD to me. Deleted as such.


 * You said in the edit summary "Originally tagged WP:A11 but there is no indication it was created by the author or someone they know" so I can only assume you confused this with WP:CSD. If I have misinterpreted this feel free to correct me. Chillum 13:57, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I mean, I tagged the article A11 because I've noticed admins will often speedy delete an article with A11 if it's an article that was obviously made up, even if the article doesn't explicitly state that it was. I think it really comes down to your interpretation of A11: "An article which plainly indicates that the subject was invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally..." (emphasis is mine).  The question is what does plainly indicate mean?   Can we infer that the subject was coined by the creator, even if it isn't explicitly stated.  From what I've seen since my return, that appears to be the consensus among some of the admins.   BMIComp  14:18, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Ack. I see now I have misinterpreted 's edit summary, it was in fact referring to A11 and not G7. I think I was confused because G11 does not talk about the author stating it was made up, but rather it refers to it plainly indicating that it was made up. I think this goes beyond statement and allows some level of judgment. A quick google of "clamtrek" shows Wikipedia and a few social media sites. It passes the "something we made up after school" test.


 * It also lacked any credible claim of significance or importance.


 * Since I misinterpreted GB fan when I deleted the page I am more than happy to discuss my delete further with him(thus the ping), though I am personally satisfied that it met the criteria for A11. Chillum 14:22, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * , there are two pieces to WP:A11, one is the same as WP:A7, no claim to significance. The article clearly failed that.  The other part is that it was "invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally."  This is where I feel the article failed WP:A11.  There was no indication that it was made up by the article's creator or someone they know personally.  If the criteria didn't have that part it would just be WP:A7.  I am not contesting the deletion, just that I do not believe it met the WP:A11 criterion as written.  GB fan 19:33, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Gareth Thompson Author
Gareth has asked for his details to be removed for the time being including his photo and to be restored if need be at a later date — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carnival95 (talk • contribs) 12:26, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Please claim your upload(s): File:Chicago police car vertical.jpg
Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as own, amending the information added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Please claim your upload(s): File:Front police car.jpg
Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as own, amending the information added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:54, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Millenium Park Fountain people.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Millenium Park Fountain people.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Millenium Park Fountain 2.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Millenium Park Fountain 2.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Barack Obama. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Barack Obama.. Since you had some involvement with the Barack Obama. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question)  19:39, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DePaul University College of Law (emblem).png
Thanks for uploading File:DePaul University College of Law (emblem).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 06:01, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:DePaul University College of Law (emblem).png


The page File:DePaul University College of Law (emblem).png has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

"F5: Unused non-free media file"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ✗ plicit  00:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)