User talk:Bmistler

humor
Briefly, "theory" is but one of the results of "research". Please compare the articles I started: Theories of humor and Humor research. Unfortunately I am not an expert in the topic and I cannot continue serious development of the topic; I only laid down some directions, since there is much confusion in the topics of laughter and humor; probably because the wikipedia texts on these topics are written by the same laymen as me but much bolder :-). The topics badly need input from experts. Laudak (talk) 17:19, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Dan Bloom
A tag has been placed on Dan Bloom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jokestress (talk) 20:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Qwertial Aphasia
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Qwertial Aphasia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Neologism.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. WWGB (talk) 12:36, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Qwertial Aphasia
An article that you have been involved in editing, Qwertial Aphasia, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WWGB (talk) 03:09, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of M. Pat Korb
An article that you have been involved in editing, M. Pat Korb, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:32, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of M. Pat Korb
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is M. Pat Korb. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/M. Pat Korb. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Bmistler! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:36, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Philip Brownell -

Nomination of Brian J. Mistler for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian J. Mistler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brian J. Mistler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:54, 7 May 2019 (UTC)