User talk:Bnal/sandbox

Article Evaluation for Thracian Tomb of Kazanlak

This article seems biased in some of its language, using phrases like "best preserved," and attempts to evaluate the nature of a mural from one view point. The author here mentions that this isn't the only view point, but doesn't address any other specific opinions. The author then makes the claim that these murals are the "best preserved" from this time period in this area. All the information in the article, with the exception of the last two sentences, is missing citations. Both citations lead to official Bulgarian websites, which can be seen as biased sources, and the author doesn't make any mention of the bias existing in these sources.

This article doesn't have any conversations on its talk page yet, but it is part of a few wiki projects.

Bnal (talk) 03:35, 7 November 2017 (UTC)bnal