User talk:Bneu2013/Archive 3

Upgrading U.S. Route 25E's article to Good status
Hello again,

I am currently working on expanding the article for U.S. Route 25E to good article status. I have noticed your spectacular work on state and Interstate highway articles in our great state of Tennessee. I would appreciate it if you could help me in the goal of getting US 25E's article to GA status.

US 25E is a very significant roadway in the state of Tennessee, it has a lot of federal investment given its status as a Congressional High Priority Corridor, the East Tennessee Crossing Scenic Byway, and as Corridors F and S of the Appalachian Development Highway System. In addition, the construction of the Cumberland Gap Tunnel that carries the roadway is considered a national engineering feat.

New plans are being proposed to it being upgraded to Interstate/freeway standards due to the heavy amount of freight traffic on the corridor.

Looking forward to hearing back from you,

Thanks, AppalachianCentrist (talk) 02:58, 4 January 2023 (UTC)


 * - Thank you. First of all, this source provides a history of the numerical designations of the route, even though you will probably want to corroborate anything you use with better sources, such as maps, newspaper articles, or AASHTO minutes. Also take a look at the entries on US 25, US 25W, and SR 32. Also, I just found a 1966 task force report about the feasibility of the Cumberland Gap Tunnel. I actually worked on that article about two years ago, but somehow got caught up in something else. I will take a look at it again. I can also tell you what I know about this route, however. As the article mentions, both states began widening the route prior to construction of the tunnels. I'm pretty sure the last section to be widened was the stretch through Claiborne County south of Tazewell, which I think may not have been finished until the mid-2000s. I'm also pretty sure the stretch over Clinch Mountain was finished in the early 1980s, but I'm not totally certain of this. This podcast mentions some project in Grainger County that was under construction in the 1990s; I think it may have been the stretch between Bean Station and Clinch Mountain, but additional sources should corroborate this. In the meantime, I will try to find some newspaper articles, and will post my findings here shortly. Bneu2013 (talk) 18:06, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Bneu2013. Thank you for your work on Lt. Alexander "Sandy" Bonnyman Memorial Bridge. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   16:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 81 in Tennessee
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Interstate 81 in Tennessee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Floydian -- Floydian (talk) 01:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 81 in Tennessee
The article Interstate 81 in Tennessee you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Interstate 81 in Tennessee and Talk:Interstate 81 in Tennessee/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Floydian -- Floydian (talk) 01:00, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 81 in Tennessee
The article Interstate 81 in Tennessee you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Interstate 81 in Tennessee for comments about the article, and Talk:Interstate 81 in Tennessee/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Floydian -- Floydian (talk) 08:09, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Interstate 81 in Tennessee
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Discord
Have you considered joining the Discord server? –Fredddie™ 05:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)


 * - No, I haven't. In fact I don't know much about this service. Bneu2013 (talk) 07:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * The short answer is that it's a chat server filled with other editors from around Wikipedia. There is a channel called #wpengineering that several of us hang/lurk out in. –Fredddie™ 13:50, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bicentennial Capitol Mall State Park
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bicentennial Capitol Mall State Park you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shawn Teller -- Shawn Teller (talk) 02:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

FAC
You might want to consider reviewing other nominations in the (unspoken) hopes that someone will review yours. It's a shame that FAC has downgraded to this level but unfortunately that's how it is nowadays. At the minimum, it does fractionally increase the probability that someone will review yours.

I can always review, however I would prefer to only do so if there is a critical lack of reviewers and the nomination is in danger of being archived, due to the recent controversies regarding the road projects. Rschen7754 05:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)


 * - Thanks. This is the first article I have ever nominated as an FAC, and I'm not sure I would consider myself qualified yet to conduct FA reviews yet. I do, however, have a good bit of experience with GA reviews, and I will take a look at the backlog. I'd strongly appreciate if you'd be willing to review this nomination; I actually posted a notification of this review at WT:USRD and WT:TN when I nominated, but that doesn't seem to have done much good. I'm honestly not sure what controversies you are referring to. Bneu2013 (talk) 05:43, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * These links would sum it up: I can still review it and I intend to if the nomination is in danger of being archived, however I think a review from someone outside the road projects would be more valuable. --Rschen7754 05:49, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * - I was completely unaware of this controversy, and don't see that it directly affects this review. However, I was actually leaning towards editors active in the roads WikiProject, as this area is their expertise, but I would appreciate editors from any disciplines. Bneu2013 (talk) 05:57, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Generally FAC wants at least one non-subject area editor to review. The magic number tends to be 3 supports with no opposing but that is never explicitly stated anywhere and is not a firm standard. --Rschen7754 05:59, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * - Okay. Once again, if you'd be willing to review, I'd be beyond appreciated, as I believe this would be one of the most valuable articles under the scope of WP:USRD to get to FA status. If you also have any ideas for what I could do to get more reviewers, please let me know. Bneu2013 (talk) 06:05, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I hope you don't take my hesitation to continue the review personally - unfortunately there seem to be a few too many big things that need to be fixed in what I've read so far. If they let me continue I will but I am hesitant to do so at this point. There's also a lot of things that are not as they once were - WP:HWY/ACR is mostly inactive these days and WP:FAC is de facto a quid pro quo - the delegates will never admit that, but that is reality. The road projects are also under a lot of pressure with the map RFC, all the AFDs, and more. If you take it back you really need to make sure that you're not adding stuff to the RD that is not cited - not just the scenery, but the other things. A WP:GOCE copyedit might be helpful, but there should be the clear expectation that you will take it with a grain of salt as sometimes their fixes make a mess. Hopefully one day things will be better, but it is hard to say at this point. --Rschen7754 06:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I understand. Note that I am going to work on the remaining points you posted, and let you know when I am through. Bneu2013 (talk) 04:40, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bicentennial Capitol Mall State Park
The article Bicentennial Capitol Mall State Park you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bicentennial Capitol Mall State Park for comments about the article, and Talk:Bicentennial Capitol Mall State Park/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shawn Teller -- Shawn Teller (talk) 02:23, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WCLE-FM.png
Thanks for uploading File:WCLE-FM.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Curses
I'm sorry to hear your FAC nomination was archived. Please know my offer to review the article was sincere. I just had some real life stuff come up that made this timing difficult. I'd be happy to review it should it be nominated again. Dave (talk) 15:14, 6 April 2023 (UTC)


 * - I totally understand; I'm actually very busy myself these days. Do you think it would violate WP:CANVAS if I were to let you know whenever I nominated again? I think I'm going to wait until the maps RfC is over, and work on the recommended improvements in the meantime. Bneu2013 (talk) 20:07, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'd be happy to do it. Just ping me when you're done resolving the feedback you've already received and I'd be happy to give it an informal looksie as well. If anybody has a problem with that, remind them we're reason we volunteer our time here is to help build an encyclopedia. If they have a problem with someone asking for reviews and feedback to help make an article better well that says more about them than it does you. It's unfortunate, but politely suggesting to such people they need to talk to their therapist about upping the dosage on the stability meds is a survival skill around here. Dave (talk) 22:27, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Bicentennial Capitol Mall State Park
Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tennessee State Route 397
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tennessee State Route 397 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 420Traveler -- 420Traveler (talk) 14:34, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hey, you still doing this, Bneu? - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 03:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * - Yes, the user appears to have abandoned the review. I'd like for someone else to take it over. Bneu2013 (talk) 03:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * No, sorry, what I meant was whether you're still trying to promote it. I took it over a few days ago. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 03:57, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * - Yes, I am. I strongly apologize, but I somehow missed that. Looks like I let the review page expire from my watchlist. I will get to work immediately. Bneu2013 (talk) 03:58, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * No problem. I still have to finish reading it over and checking the sources. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 04:01, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tennessee State Route 397
The article Tennessee State Route 397 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tennessee State Route 397 for comments about the article, and Talk:Tennessee State Route 397/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 420Traveler -- 420Traveler (talk) 06:41, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tennessee State Route 158
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tennessee State Route 158 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 420Traveler -- 420Traveler (talk) 00:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Tennessee history edit reversion by you was high-handed and wrong
You reverted a significant and DOCUMENTED BY TWO REFERENCES edit I made to Tennessee history, including especially information about lynchings in the state. What reason can you give for doing this? It actually happened and it's significant and in my opinion should be noted in the history for the decades following the Civil War. Your revsion edit said "This may be too much information". That is not an adequate reason. I'm asking you to restore the basic information about lynchings. You may reduce its bulk, but you should not "sanitize" the history of a place because you find it distasteful. I too am from Tennessee and I am just as concerned for the state as you, and I would like to see Wikipedia reflect the truth about things that happened there in the past. Please restore the lynching information with the two references that I provided, or I intend to escalate a complaint about you. Harborsparrow (talk) 16:30, 1 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but my main reason was to ensure that the article doesn't get too long and maintains its Good Article status. I suggest you take a look a WP:Summary style if you aren't familiar with this guideline. Also remember that verifiability does not guarantee inclusion. First of all, there is no need to split the sentences about sharecropping, lynchings, the Coal Creek War, the Centennial exposition, etc. into subsections. With regards to lynchings, while these were indeed tragic, what is even more tragic is that lynchings and other acts of racial violence were in no way unique to Tennessee. If you know of a more unique act of racial violence, such as the Tulsa race massacre or the 1912 racial conflict in Forsyth County, Georgia, then we should probably include it. We already include the Memphis riots of 1866 and Assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.. In order to summarize the history, we generally try to stick to events that were significant and unique to the state. The first few sentences you added were also off topic, and belong on articles that describe lynchings. That being said, we could probably include a sentence about the number of lynchings that occurred during the post war era, but the article History of Tennessee would be a better place to add in-depth content about historical events. If you are interested in adding this, I suggest you raise the issue on the talk page. Bneu2013 (talk) 16:50, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

"Out of work" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Out_of_work&redirect=no Out of work] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:26, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

DYK for 75/24 Split
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC) GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Interstate 65 in Tennessee
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Interstate 65 in Tennessee, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox/43&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Bneu2013&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1165146340 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interstate_65_in_Tennessee&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1165146340%7CInterstate%2065%20in%20Tennessee%5D%5D Ask for help])

Your GA nomination of Tennessee State Route 158
The article Tennessee State Route 158 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tennessee State Route 158 and Talk:Tennessee State Route 158/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Freedom4U -- Freedom4U (talk) 00:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tennessee State Route 158
The article Tennessee State Route 158 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tennessee State Route 158 for comments about the article, and Talk:Tennessee State Route 158/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Freedom4U -- Freedom4U (talk) 22:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Blue Orgin GA Nonimanation
Good Afternoon,

I submitted the Wiki page for Blue Origin for a good article review. I had worked on it a lot and think it meets the criteria for a good article. I saw you reviewed am additional article. Would you be able to review the Blue Origin article when you have time and interested? Señor Jakob (talk) 01:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes, I am a little further behind on my current reviews that I'd like to be, but I can take a look at it in a day or two if someone else doesn't pick in up. Bneu2013 (talk) 10:26, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Tennessee State Route 158 at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:13, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite retirement, and goodbye for now.
@Bneu2013,

Just wanted to tell you that I will be indefinitely retiring from Wikipedia effectively as of yesterday. I apologize for this notice, but I wanted to say thank you for your help with upgrading several articles with me. While I am gone, I would ask as a personal favour, if you could help complete some of my work in upgrading U.S. Route 25E, U.S. Route 11W, Tellico Dam, 1972 Bean Station bus-truck collision, and Morristown, Tennessee to good article status, if you're willing to of course.

Hope we can keep in touch.

Thanks and best of luck, AppalachianCentrist (talk) 21:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)


 * - sorry to see you go. I'd like to encourage you to reconsider you're decision, but if you're unwilling to edit frequently, that's fine. I've had plenty of bouts of inactivity, but I've never fully retired. That being said, I will continue work on those articles. Bneu2013 (talk) 19:17, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Your connectivity issues
Are you still having the issues you mentioned here?

I noticed you don't have IPBE, which would make them a non-issue. I would grant it to you myself, but a) current policy strongly discourages admins from doing that except in cases where we have known the user for a long time and are prepared to vouch for them and b) more importantly, given the WT:GAN thread that led to you doing this review (I think), I would come across as extremely hypocritical if I did, since it would be hard not to see an implicit quid pro quo.

But ... I could ask the checkusers, or one of them, if (as current procedure requires) they'd be willing to look at your account and decide whether to grant it to you themselves. You can do this yourself via the instructions at WP:IPECPROXY if you really want to keep it aboveboard, but that may take longer. Daniel Case (talk) 19:05, 22 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes, I am still having connectivity issues. Although my individual IP has never made any edits, it is currently blocked via a range block for open proxy. I have contacted my ISP, but they haven't been very helpful. If IPBE is an option, I would like to have it. My only concern is since I have edited from shared IP addresses at educational institutions in the past, I don't want the checkusers to think I was socking. I even got blocked by a checkuser about four years ago (who was obviously fishing) who claimed that I was editing logged out, although I continue to maintain my innocence. Suspiciously, he was unwilling to let me know exactly what evidence he had to suspect this. But if I am not mistaken, the arbitration committee has cracked down on fishing since then. While I'll never be at the top, I think I have demonstrated myself to be a trusted contributor to this project, however. If you'd like to ask a checkuser, that would be fine. Bneu2013 (talk) 01:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * ISPs, in my experience, really can't and don't do much to help users in your position (I review a great deal of unblock requests of that type).
 * The checkusers would be more concerned with who might be using your address or the ones adjacent to it now (But of course it would be good to mention that in your request, just for full disclosure's sake).
 * Checkusers rarely share their evidence ... it's a condition of having that tool, in fact. Because if they did let everyone know what they based the technical aspect of their conclusions on, the committed sockmasters would use that knowledge to (at least) try to get better and hide themselves.
 * It's the end of a long and tiring day away from my desk ... I'll ask tomorrow, or as soon as I can. Daniel Case (talk) 06:20, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pellissippi Parkway
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pellissippi Parkway you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 06:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pellissippi Parkway
The article Pellissippi Parkway you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pellissippi Parkway and Talk:Pellissippi Parkway/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 06:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pellissippi Parkway
The article Pellissippi Parkway you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pellissippi Parkway for comments about the article, and Talk:Pellissippi Parkway/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 19:42, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

William Friedkin RIP
Just noting re the ongoing GAR on The Exorcist that William Friedkin died today, scotching one of my wilder ideas about getting some clarification on some questions I still have by actually putting them to him on video. Oh well ...

Shame for him he didn't live to see the film's 50th aniversary ... Daniel Case (talk) 18:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Sad to hear about this. I wonder if there's anyone else who was involved in the production that you could reach out to. But if you were to learn any information that wasn't available in any reliable sources, I don't guess you could include it. Bneu2013 (talk) 16:25, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Well, the idea is that if it’s verifiably the real person answering the question, that trumps OR. We had a user named years back (not active now) who actually was able to interview people like Al Sharpton about things in articles and use those videos as sources. But, it’s true, we’ve never really resolved this as a policy thing.
 * BTW, I am currently in Singapore at Wikimania, so I may not be as able to respond and make changes to the article for the next week (and not at all while I am traveling back home next Monday). Daniel Case (talk) 06:25, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I made some responses and changes yesterday ... I'm back, even if getting over the jet lag has me up and at it before 7 a.m. Daniel Case (talk) 10:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
 * - Sorry, I almost forgot about this. I'm extremely busy myself now, but will take a look later today. Bneu2013 (talk) 20:33, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Undo of Alan Jones (Businessman)
Good morning. I am inquiring about the undo you made to Alan Jones (businessman). Your only comment was "Puffery and possibly COI edits". I am not sure what you mean by puffery, but the edits I made corrected the text. The original text states he wiretapped his ex-wife's phone, when in fact it was his own phone, and thus the basis for the courts decision. The copy is misleading and biased. I attempted to make the copy neutral and more consistent with the article. As for COI edits, I do know Mr Jones as I am a local Cleveland citizen. This makes me part of the limited audience for this content, and I would prefer it to be correct. I don't think that is a conflict of interest. I find your reasons for undoing my edits inadequate. If I have cited a source incorrectly, please let me know. If I have made untrue statements, let me know. If there is some tribunal of editors that needs to judge the value of "puffery" rather than a single vague opinion, let me know. Other wise, I am going to undo your undo. The edits were reviewed by another editor and my explanation was accepted. Millertraci (talk) 16:25, 11 August 2023 (UTC)


 * - I apologize, most of what I undid was puffery that had been added just before your edits. This was about something entirely different in this section, not the wiretapping. With regards to the wiretapping, if the case says that the device was placed on his phone (I don't remember), feel free to reinstate that. Just don't add anything that is not in the source and don't undo my whole edit. In case you don't know, this article has had COI edits since its creation, which is why it is pending changes protected. Bneu2013 (talk) 00:04, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Pellissippi Parkway
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gatlinburg Bypass
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gatlinburg Bypass you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 06:03, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gatlinburg Bypass
The article Gatlinburg Bypass you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gatlinburg Bypass and Talk:Gatlinburg Bypass/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 07:01, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gatlinburg Bypass
The article Gatlinburg Bypass you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gatlinburg Bypass for comments about the article, and Talk:Gatlinburg Bypass/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in the August 2023 GAN backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:I-40-Nashville-1962.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:I-40-Nashville-1962.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:
 * File:Malfunction junction knoxville 1970s.jpg

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

The Center Line: Fall 2023
  Volume 10, Issue 1 • Fall 2023 • About the Newsletter • A New Future for Road Articles Online  Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
 * Features
 * —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of  Imzadi 1979  →  on 19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Tennessee State Route 158
—Kusma (talk) 00:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Interstate 40 in Tennessee scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 16 November 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Today's featured article/November 16, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you today for the article, "about the second-longest freeway segment within a U.S. state east of the Mississippi River, and arguably the most important road in Tennessee by a long shot. This road is culturally significant in that it passes through one of the most important regions instrumental in the development of popular music (Hence its nickname "Music Highway"), and is also connected to a landmark United States Supreme Court case that has had implications on probably all highway construction projects since."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:37, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Congratulations on finally getting this to FA status and for having a TFA. You went through a lot for it. Thanks for all of your work. —  AjaxSmack 22:37, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Precious
You are recipient no. 2892 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Barbara Bush FAC
Hello! It's been a while since there have been any comments on your review at Featured article candidates/Barbara Bush/archive1. I just wanted to check in and see if you had any thoughts on the last two sections and if I've addressed everything else to your satisfaction. Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 02:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC)


 * - Thanks for the reminder; I will take a look later today. Unfortunately personal obligations have reduced my availability on Wikipedia in recent weeks, and once I finish this review and another one I am working on, I am going to have to reduce my activity. But I should be able to finish my review today. Bneu2013 (talk) 13:01, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Orchard MRT Station GA
Hi, I understand that you were planning to do the GA review of Orchard MRT station. I'm not the involved editor, but since it's been a while since your last comment on Sep 23rd, I just wanted to check whether you're still continuing to do the review. I don't mean to rush you or anything if you're busy, I just wanted to check in because it has been quite a while since the last comment. S5A-0043 Talk 04:55, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * - thanks for the notice. Yes, I'm afraid I'm going to have to have someone else take over this review. I'm currently working on two other reviews that I plan to finish, but once I do so, I'm going to have to take a break from reviews for a while, as my schedule has become more demanding in recent months than in the past. Bneu2013 (talk) 05:10, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Alright, I understand. I'll edit the template to indicate that you're withdrawing the review. S5A-0043 Talk 05:25, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Retiring permanently
@Bneu2013,

I am retiring permanently from Wikipedia due to issues with another user. If you need anything from me, please do not hesitate to reach out, I may not respond as quickly as I used to, but I appreciate your work to make more Tennessee-related articles to GA status.

Please consider to finish my work on making U.S. Route 25E and U.S. Route 11W to GA status, and possibly Morristown, Tennessee as well.

I hope you had a great Christmas, and hope you will have a happy new year.

Best wishes and so long, AppalachianCentrist (talk) 03:02, 27 December 2023 (UTC)


 * - I really wish you would reconsider this decision. I know very well how frustrating conflicts with other users can be, but we've lost a lot of great content contributors in recent years, and I fear that giving up will only embolden these non-content contributors, who, in my opinion, are not here to build an encyclopedia. I don't know the details of your conflict, but if you feel that there is some policy violation going on, then I urge you to bring it up at the proper place. But if not, then I hate to see you go. I was hoping you would be able to work more on those articles; they will not be easy to get to GA status. US 11W and 25E are without a doubt two of the most historically significant highways, not just in Tennessee, but in the entire Southeast; they would be some of the most valuable articles to appear on the Main Page. Bneu2013 (talk) 23:44, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16
An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited The Pinnacle (Bristol, Tennessee), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Twin city.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to the drive!
Welcome, welcome, welcome Bneu2013! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles. CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:39, 1 February 2024 UTC //en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bneu2013&action=purge refresh via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

The Exorcist progress report
Per your question a while back in this edit, after the moment where, as outlined in the discussion I had with Buidhe afterwards, I had to realize that a) there was no realistic chance I could get the article to FA in the time I had left last year with the issues I was having, and b) I was also pretty burnt out after devoting so much of my previous year to developing and improving it and it would be good if I were able to take a break. In retrospect I cannot say I accomplished nothing ... that article is not only a GA now, it is vastly improved from what it was in 2020 when I began working on it with an eye toward FA. "A man's reach should exceed his grasp, or what's a heaven for?", I suppose.

As far as bringing it up to FA for this Halloween, well ... this has happened before of course but it happened again in a pretty big way with this article: just when I thought I had done all the research I possibly could, read everything available out there, more information was released that I will have to look into. The 50th anniversary led to the publication of not just one, not just two but three books on the film. I will have to acquire and read them at some point soon (not ready to do that just yet).

Anyhow, re your concerns about HALFLIFE, I do of course continue to watchlist the article and keep it up to the new standard I've gotten it to.

But I think longer might be better before an FAC at this point. I returned to the production article over the past week or so, thinking all I'd really need to do at this point was copyedit a bit and make sure that everything I cut from that part of the main article that I thought was more relevant to the production article was, indeed, in the latter. But in the process I found several insufficient references to the 1998 Mark Kermode 25th anniversary documentary, The Fear of God. I figured I'd either have to confirm them by finding, possibly, a copy online (and give missing timestamps) or delete them entirely.

It turned out to be the former, and since both the production article and the main article had duplicate citations to the documentary I had to clean that up as well. And not only were timestamps a definite need, since the doc is 77 minutes long, I had to watch the whole thing to find the relevant sections. And, of course, find anything more that might be worth adding to the article, which there was.

And in checking some of the other sources, I found more interesting sources that I wish I'd found earlier. A lot of that relates to the themes (and I will have to undelete the themes article, as I plan on later this month taking a nice day trip to a nearby college library and really taking a deep dive into the academic and scholarly work available that's otherwise paywalled from my computer and not available through the Wikipedia Library).

Because of what I found, I am beginning to think that we could justify at least two more spinoff articles: Music in The Exorcist and The Exorcist curse (the latter of which there is enough reliably sourceable material on to apply to the whole franchise, really. And maybe there's a possible article on the lines of Angiography scene in The Exorcist). This is in addition to the likely Reception of The Exorcist spinoff.

People talk about getting lost in rabbit holes on Wikipedia. That leaves out that someone has to actually dig them ("When at last the work is done / Don't sit down it's time to dig another one")

Take a look and tell me what you think ... Daniel Case (talk) 06:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)


 * - sorry, I totally forgot about that discussion. At least we were able to get a DYK for the article this past Halloween. I actually did a quick Google Search, and most of the 50th anniversary coverage I could find actually seemed to take place before the actual anniversary. For example, this NYT article was published more than two months before the actual anniversary. So I don't guess its as big of a disappointment. Also, most people probably didn't see the film until 1974; my dad was a senior in high school at the time, and didn't hear about it until he returned from Christmas break. But, yes, I do agree that this article would greatly benefit from the spinoff articles you have suggested. Even though, as I mentioned before, I am not a strict 10k'er, and as such, I think it is perfectly fine for this article to remain above 10k words, even with the proposed spinoffs, as long as the sections remain at summary length. There is certainly a lot of noteworthy content about the production, reception, curse, etc., that is worth including on Wikipedia and should definitely go in spinoff articles. Also, the reception article would also probably be a good place to go in depth about the audience reactions, in addition to the reviews from critics. Bneu2013 (talk) 22:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, it seems that the release of The Exorcist: Believer kind of stole/piggybacked on the 50th anniversary's thunder (as it was quite likely intended to do). The article hit its peak in daily pageviews of 63,000+ last year around that film's release date; the actual 50th anniversary date didn't show much of an increase from the usual level (of course it would have if it had been the Main Page FA, but ...). That day I don't remember it having been noted in the media that much, actually (largely because as circumstances had it I was away from home most of that day, which might be part of that).
 * Maybe I aim for the 55th anniversary, now . Definitely can work with that timeframe. Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of APD-40
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article APD-40 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 06:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of APD-40
The article APD-40 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:APD-40 and Talk:APD-40/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:41, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of APD-40
The article APD-40 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:APD-40 for comments about the article, and Talk:APD-40/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 19:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of APD-40
Hello! Your submission of APD-40 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Naruto love hinata 5 (talk · contributions) 10:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 65 in Tennessee
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Interstate 65 in Tennessee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 17:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paul Huff Parkway
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paul Huff Parkway you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 14:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 65 in Tennessee
The article Interstate 65 in Tennessee you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Interstate 65 in Tennessee for comments about the article, and Talk:Interstate 65 in Tennessee/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 01:23, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paul Huff Parkway
The article Paul Huff Parkway you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Paul Huff Parkway and Talk:Paul Huff Parkway/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 13:25, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paul Huff Parkway
The article Paul Huff Parkway you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Paul Huff Parkway for comments about the article, and Talk:Paul Huff Parkway/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 13:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Bean Station, Tennessee

 * Hi Bneu2013, I've substantially rearranged the article to be (hopefully) more consistent and useful. I've moved a lot of material around and retitled many subsections, and I've also merged a few sections. There's an uncited paragraph in "Demographics" --> "2010 census". Anyway, good luck with the article. Cheers,  Baffle☿gab  15:02, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * - Sorry for the late response. The article looks good. Thanks for the copyedit! Bneu2013 (talk) 09:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

New message from Narutolovehinata5
 Naruto love hinata 5 (talk · contributions) 08:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Paul Huff Parkway
Hello! Your submission of Paul Huff Parkway at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 55 in Tennessee
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Interstate 55 in Tennessee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Elli -- Elli (talk) 23:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 55 in Tennessee
The article Interstate 55 in Tennessee you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Interstate 55 in Tennessee and Talk:Interstate 55 in Tennessee/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Elli -- Elli (talk) 23:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 55 in Tennessee
The article Interstate 55 in Tennessee you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Interstate 55 in Tennessee for comments about the article, and Talk:Interstate 55 in Tennessee/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Elli -- Elli (talk) 00:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Interstate 65 in Tennessee
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of U.S. Route 23 in Tennessee
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article U.S. Route 23 in Tennessee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NoobThreePointOh -- NoobThreePointOh (talk) 09:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of U.S. Route 23 in Tennessee
The article U.S. Route 23 in Tennessee you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:U.S. Route 23 in Tennessee and Talk:U.S. Route 23 in Tennessee/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NoobThreePointOh -- NoobThreePointOh (talk) 10:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of U.S. Route 23 in Tennessee
The article U.S. Route 23 in Tennessee you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:U.S. Route 23 in Tennessee for comments about the article, and Talk:U.S. Route 23 in Tennessee/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NoobThreePointOh -- NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Paul Huff Parkway
RoySmith (talk) 00:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC)