User talk:Boab

Nice to see beautiful Freddie Image
I am GLAD to see that we have a beautiful Freddie image. I will have to work some more on this page now!Boab (talk) 17:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Dan Schneider (writer)
I fixed the Articles for deletion nomination for the page. This was actually the third nomination and can now be found at Articles for deletion/Dan Schneider (writer) (3rd nomination). --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:09, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2016
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you have done by continuing to add unreliable information to Snopes.com, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.-- Jim in Georgia  Contribs  Talk  02:17, 12 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Funny to watch Jim in Georgia accuse me of "vandalizing" Wikipedia. In what way? What exactly did I do? Because I added a sentence along with seven (non-blog) references? Do you also want to send me to Siberia, Jim in Georgia?Boab (talk) 23:49, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Snopes.com. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. McGeddon (talk) 18:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Discretionary sanctions alert
Ian.thomson (talk) 23:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Alex Jones (radio host). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:19, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

PA
Please do not accuse other users of bias or assume bad faith. it is against policy and can lead to bansSlatersteven (talk) 23:49, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

I have not accused you of bias, not assumed bad faith. If I have kindly provide the quote or withdraw the accusation.Slatersteven (talk) 00:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

ani
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, specifically pushing fringe theories and displaying a belligerent BATTLEGROUND approach to disputes. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 01:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)