User talk:Board of Editors

Proposed deletion of Board of Editors in the Life Sciences
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Board of Editors in the Life Sciences, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Self-promotional piece by a self-appointed certification body, written by a couple of SPAs. Only 300 ghits, a low number for a professional body and nothing that seems to be in any way "significant" coverage. References do not support notability. Fails WP:N, WP:COI

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. andy (talk) 23:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Board of Editors in the Life Sciences has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Thingg &#8853; &#8855; 03:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ Also, my apologies for the incorrect warning above. I did not realize you had wanted the page deleted. If you would like a page that you created deleted, you can simply put db-author on it and it will be deleted shortly. Thingg &#8853; &#8855;  03:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)