User talk:Boasnowprincess

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Boasnowprincess, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Girls' Generation. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Ald™ ¬_¬™ 15:34, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Beloved Freak  12:13, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Fashion
I noticed your edits on Fashion, and I'm glad you want to contribute new content to the article. Unfortunately, even if everything you wrote is correct, it can't stay on Wikipedia without having citations (see WP:V). Also, while linking is important, not everything should be linked (see WP:OVERLINK). I hope you find the sources you need. --Juventas (talk) 02:57, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid I've removed the additions to fashion and comeback as they were just large amounts of unsourced, unattributed material that appears to come from your own personal knowledge. You contributions are appreciated but your additions need to be easily verifiable. When Wikipedia first started, this was the way it grew so quickly, because people came along and just added what they know. Things are a bit different now though and the project is intended to be a serious encyclopedia. As a tertiary source, our content comes directly from reliable secondary sources, only including what has already been discussed in those kinds of sources. Please don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions on this. -- Beloved Freak  08:32, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Rose Dawson Calvert for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rose Dawson Calvert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rose Dawson Calvert until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Beloved Freak  16:41, 22 September 2011 (UTC)