User talk:Boatie62

Hello  & Wilkommen! Welkom! Bienvenue! Benvenuti! ようこそ! Välkommen! Witamy! Bem-vindo(a)! ¡Bienvenido! Добро пожаловать! 欢迎! Basically, welcome to Wikipedia!  Click here to respond to this message!

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to User:Reactionaryprinciple/Mark Loveys, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. N o f o rmation Talk  23:31, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * There should not have been a warning here. You were right to remove that attack page. Ryan Vesey (talk) 23:34, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, this was my mistake, I meant to revert without warning and then tag the page as an attack page. If you would prefer I can remove the notice rather than just have it striked out.  N o f o rmation  Talk  23:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Refer current edit war in page on Satellite Spies. I am trying to rvv to an accurate version substantially the same as that independently researched, validated and edited by moderator Shell Kinney on 9th June 2009. Recent edits & statements by DunedinYoh (suspect formerly blocked user Reactionaryprinciple) are incorrect, unsubstantiated and borderline defamatory. I'm not sure how to progress this. Thanks for any assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boatie62  (talk • contribs)   22:54, 1 August 2012(UTC)
 * The page is now protected. This is not an endorsement of the current version. These edits are not vandalism and it is wrong to treat them as such. You need to resolve the dispute with the user. If you cannot, consider getting a third opinion. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 03:54, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Satellite Spies article, currently locked.
Please can the last paragraph of the locked article called "Satellite Spies" be removed immediately, because it has an unsupported and defamatory statement about Mark Loveys acting illegally, which could be materially damaging to his business reputation. Mark Loveys has previously employed a specialist IP lawyer to investigate and document the fact that he is not acting illegally with respect to the trade marks listed in the current article. Thank you. Boatie62 (talk) 05:12, 4 August 2012 (UTC) As only an admin can help you with this, I've changed the template as such. Theopolisme  TALK 06:43, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅. I have removed that sentence. Any further discussion should be on the talk page of the article. If you cannot reach WP:Consensus by discussion on the talk page, see WP:Dispute resolution for how to proceed. Wikipedia is not the place to pursue this feud, and editing the article would best be left to editors with no conflict of interest. JohnCD (talk) 07:59, 4 August 2012 (UTC).

Nomination of Satellite Spies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Satellite Spies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Satellite Spies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JohnCD (talk) 23:03, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Glyn Hugh Tucker.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Glyn Hugh Tucker.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:02, 21 September 2012 (UTC)