User talk:Boatstud

Harry Munns
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Harry Munns, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 15:15, 18 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! The notice above is self-explantory.  Material cannot be taken from another website without an explict waiver of copyright.  Material should also be written from a neutral point of view, and should have independent attestation in the form of citations to third-party sources.  Notability can be established by such sources.  In this case, citation to the published books will help establish notability.  Finally, if you are, or are related to, the article's subject, please do not conribute to it, but read Wikipedia's guidelines on conflicts of interest.  Thank you, and keep contributing!  Kablammo 15:21, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Harry Munns, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Improbcat 16:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

another view
From another admin who happened to look at that page: I think the copyvio version you had shows him to be notable as an author. It was, of course, necessarily deleted as a copyvio. The stubbified version was probably deleted because it didn't show much of anything, and the deleting administrator didn't look at the earlier versions. I would have, but though I can undelete article, there needs to be a new version, as the two prior ones were neither of them that suitable. What I think you ought to do now is create another page for him. Do it I will keep track of this talk page--you should respond here if necessary to keep it all together. DGG (talk) 18:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) in your own words as new piece of writing
 * 2) emphasizing the books. Don't just list them They were probably reviewed, and you can find the reviews. List those reviews as references,saying where they have been published. Online or print is fine, but not a blog or a list.
 * 3) Then mention the office as president of the ASA, giving a references to a newspaper or magazine article for it, preferably not the Association's. --does the Association have an article here--if so, refer to it. If not, consider creating it first. To show it important, you need references to published works about it.
 * 4) The articles(s) will need to be very strong, so it will be clear they shouldn't be speedied--and you can expect that people will try to delete them anyway. If they do speedy them, ask me to take a look& I will advise you if they are god enough to appeal to Deletion Review.