User talk:Bob.reuter

Speedy deletion of Contextual cueing
A tag has been placed on Contextual cueing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. H2H (talk) 09:24, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I've declined the speedy deletion, for the moment. To have a proper article on this subject, we'll need to show what it is in layman's terms. So, could you sum up what Contextual Cueing is in one sentence? The article as it stands reads like an abstract, which isn't appropriate for a general purpose encyclopedia. Once we have a good summary of the concept, more detail can be added in to flesh it out - but that's the first step. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 14:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Contextual cueing


A tag has been placed on Contextual cueing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=-Z8Kte4nC8wC&printsec=frontcover&dq="However,+for+principled+reasons+exposed+in+following+chapters,+such+activities+are+likely+to+lead+to+the+acquisition+of+implicit+knowledge. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bosstopher (talk) 15:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)