User talk:Bob1430

Speedy deletion of Dekodiphukan
A tag has been placed on Dekodiphukan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  N i  m i  T  i  z  e  23:18, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Dekodiphukan declined speedy. needs sources
Already declined the speedy. As you say, it's not nonsense. Needs verifiable sources, though. From what I saw on Google, that should not be a problem. Not sure it will meet notability, but sourcing will help. Cheers, and happy editing.  Dloh cierekim'''  23:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dekodiphukan
An editor has nominated Dekodiphukan, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)