User talk:BobDijs

Welcome
 Hello BobDijs, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
 * Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

BobDijs, good luck, and have fun. -- Jprg1966  (talk)  14:20, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Mistserver
Bob, your Mistserver article is a pretty well written article that does not sound too much like the marketing department wrote it, but underneath still reads like an advertisement. The lack of citation to third-party reliable sources suggests that this product is just "out-of-the-box". Normally, such products are not considered notable for the Wikipedia because they have not had time to meet the notability guidelines. Neutral (third-party) sources are needed to guarantee a neutral article can be written — self-published sources cannot be assumed to be neutral; see Autobiography and Conflict of interest for discussion of neutrality concerns of such sources. Even non-promotional self-published sources, like technical manuals that accompany a product, are still not evidence of notability as they do not measure the attention a subject has received. Please see Why we have these requirements for more information. --Bejnar (talk) 23:22, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Mistserver for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mistserver is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mistserver until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Bejnar (talk) 18:56, 8 June 2013 (UTC)