User talk:BobMorane666

August 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to K.E. on the Track has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:24, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: K.E. on the Track was changed by BobMorane666 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881552 on 2017-08-03T21:24:51+00:00.

K.E. on the Track
RipoffReport.com is not a reliable source. Do not add negative information about living persons based on such unreliable sources, as you did at K.E. on the Track. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:37, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

KE on the tracks edits
Hello, I modified KE on the tracks wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K.E._on_the_Track before you intervened to put back a previous version. firs editings I did was to take out non neutral elements and auto glorifying elements such as "Following the success of the record, he met a lot of important people in the industry and went on to work with other major artists.". I also edited out sourced links that were dead or self produced (such as links from the youtube page of the subject or billboard links that were dead). It seems to me that all of the fair editing I have done based on lack of relevent sources and non neutral speech were put back by the subject of the page himself.

He then proceeded to add new elements that were unsourced nor neutral such as "platinium record producer", claim to have worked with famous people, etc...

Since there seems to be a background of scams from the subject of the page that can't be ignored and keeping in mind that wikipedia states that biography of living people should be treated withe special care and that "A living person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until convicted by a court of law.", I think it would be best that this article is checked to edit out unrelyable sources, to keep a neutral tone, and to delete all claims that are not sourced until a relyable source is provided.

Best

NB: fair enough, ripoffreport is not a relyable source for wikipedia, therefore I imagine this paragraph of the page have to be deleted, however there is a third link from another website. Is it unrelyable as well, or is it just against wikipedia's neutral policy ?

NB2: sorry for the response on your page, I did not notice your instructions to tag you

Edit warring
Please stop WP:Edit warring on K.E. on the Track. Take your issues to the talk page, or risk being blocked. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:51, 30 August 2017 (UTC)