User talk:Bob pinker

June 2019
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN MEDUSA. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Tywardreath— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSA talk   18:50, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Tywardreath. Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 19:58, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Tywardreath. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DuncanHill (talk) 20:02, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Tywardreath. DuncanHill (talk) 20:04, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 20:09, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

thank you for your comments, you are not the keepers of the local history of my village
you have blocked me from commenting on the recent history of my own village, the place I live, who the hell made you in charge? Bob pinker (talk) 20:12, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

unblock
the comments were not defamatory, they were accurate and reflected the local history of our village for the last half decade duncan hill and others have singly taken this view and we will be taking this further Bob pinker (talk) 20:16, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

captain Medusa and duncan Hill
hi could you explain exactly what was inaccurate, unreferenced and defamatory about the post I made referencing the last 5 years of tywardreath history, you have Dick Strawbridge listed inaccurately after all, could you also please answer the following questions

at what point did you discuss with Duncan Hill that you would report my page for blocking? what did you discuss with duncan hill about my posts in reference to my being blocked? what exactly was defamatory about my post? what was inaccurate about my post? where can our lawyers contact you and Duncan hill should we need to discuss this further ?

yours sincerely

BP Bob pinker (talk) 20:29, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:31, 27 June 2019 (UTC)