User talk:Bob the ducq

Finola Hackett
As they say in the movies, "oh be-have". Seriously, though, we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so don't make joke edits. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write whatever you want (as long as it's not offensive). Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 15:48, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

That was a serious article! Finola Hackett is a real person who studies French in Alberta, came in second in the 2006 Scripps National Spelling Bee to Catherine Close after misspelling the German word Weltschmerz, plays the piano, and sings. I'm not making a joke, I'm trying to give the general public information.

Uh, yeah, um, uh, Finola Hackett is an amazing speller, but why is this on the bob the ducq discussion?

Because shut up.

Sorry, I couldn't pass up that opportunity. For real though, because Bob the Ducq created the article, and then some wise-guy moderator thought it was a joke and deleted it. Shows how much Wikipedia cares about our younger generation's spelling abilities.

HTML tags
Hi,

MediaWiki provides lots of ways to avoid using HTML. For paragraphs, simply put a blank line between them; no HTML markup is needed. It makes it easier for future editors! --Rschmertz 00:34, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Okay, sorry. I'll try and remember to avoid using HTML.

License tagging for Image:Cowboy fluke.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cowboy fluke.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 18:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Where is the side-by-side sign?
You contributed Image:SPEEDLIMIT2535.JPG and I was curious as to where it was taken. Thank you. Marc Kupper (talk) (contribs) 04:05, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Sign
It's somewhere in New Albany, Indiana--I'm not sure what the name of the street is. Bob the ducq (talk) 02:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Gengelbert Humperdinck listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gengelbert Humperdinck. Since you had some involvement with the Gengelbert Humperdinck redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:50, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gengelbert Humperdinck


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Gengelbert Humperdinck, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bridgeplayer (talk) 19:01, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MosesBillings.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:MosesBillings.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mlpearc ( powwow ) 15:01, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:DeckardEternalVigilance.png
Thanks for uploading File:DeckardEternalVigilance.png, which you've sourced to John Silk Deckard.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 21:12, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Deckard Eternal Vigilance.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Deckard Eternal Vigilance.jpg, which you've sourced to John Silk Deckard.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 21:12, 25 August 2012 (UTC)


 * NOTE: Freedom to photograph sculptures in the USA only applies to those installed before 1978 - see commons:commons:Freedom_of_panorama  Ron h jones (Talk) 21:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Spikeball


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Spikeball requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ZappyLongNose (talk) 01:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

He got off a little while ago listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect He got off a little while ago. Since you had some involvement with the He got off a little while ago redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 18:25, 15 May 2017 (UTC)